Deep Dive
1. No Codebase Updates (2024–2025)
Overview: Brett’s codebase has remained static since its February 2024 launch, with no documented GitHub activity, version upgrades, or protocol changes.
Public records and audits confirm no commits or technical improvements in the past 18 months. The project’s whitepaper emphasizes meme-driven community growth over technical innovation, aligning with its status as a cultural mascot for Base Chain.
What this means: This is neutral for BRETT because memecoins often prioritize hype over code updates, but long-term viability may require utility-driven development to sustain interest. (Source)
2. Fixed ERC-20 Structure (2024)
Overview: Brett’s ERC-20 contract was renounced at launch, locking its 10 billion supply and preventing minting or adjustments.
The immutable design eliminates upgradeability risks but limits adaptability. Liquidity pools (85% of supply) remain locked until 2025, ensuring stability but restricting protocol flexibility.
What this means: This is bullish for trust (no rug-pull risk) but bearish for innovation, as competitors with upgradable contracts can iterate faster.
3. Base Chain Dependency (2024)
Overview: Brett relies entirely on Base Chain’s Layer-2 infrastructure for transactions and scalability.
Base’s August 2025 DEX integration with Coinbase boosted BRETT’s accessibility but didn’t alter its core code. Performance hinges on Base’s upgrades, like reduced gas fees or faster finality.
What this means: This is neutral—BRETT benefits from Base’s growth but inherits its technical limitations.
Conclusion
Brett’s codebase remains unchanged since launch, prioritizing meme virality over technical evolution. While its immutable contract ensures trust, the lack of development activity raises questions about long-term differentiation. How might BRETT adapt if market demand shifts toward utility-driven tokens?