Deep Dive
1. V1 Security Patch (11 July 2025)
Overview: A re-entrancy vulnerability in GMX V1’s OrderBook contract allowed attackers to manipulate BTC short positions and drain $42M from the GLP pool. The patch disabled vulnerable functions and isolated V1 from V2 operations.
The exploit leveraged flawed price-averaging logic in V1’s globalShortAveragePrices calculations. Post-patch, V1 forks received guidance to implement similar fixes, while V2 remained unaffected due to redesigned architecture.
What this means: This is bullish for GMX because it demonstrates rapid response to critical risks, restoring confidence in protocol security. Users benefit from reduced exploit risks in V1 derivatives markets.
(Source)
2. Synthetics V2.1 Release (17 June 2025)
Overview: The update introduced Chainlink timestamp-based data streams, enabling more reliable oracle pricing, and refined liquidity pool mechanics like deposit caps and fee refunds.
Key changes included config validations to prevent invalid pool setups and support for atomic withdrawals with dynamic fees. The upgrade also added a “kink model” for borrowing rates, optimizing capital efficiency.
What this means: Neutral for GMX – while enhancing technical robustness, these are backend improvements with no immediate user-facing impact. Traders may see marginally better liquidity stability.
(Source)
3. Compensation Mechanism (13 August 2025)
Overview: Code adjustments enabled automated $44M payouts to GLP holders affected by the July exploit, using a mix of BTC, ETH, and stablecoins from secured multisig reserves.
The update included DAO-governed distribution logic and audit trails for transparency. Affected users could claim reimbursements directly via updated smart contracts.
What this means: Bullish for GMX – resolving exploit fallout through code-driven compensation reinforces trust in decentralized governance and risk management.
(Source)
Conclusion
GMX’s codebase evolved through crisis-driven security hardening (V1 patch), incremental protocol upgrades (V2.1), and post-exploit accountability systems. While reactive fixes dominated recent activity, the focus on safeguarding users and liquidity providers signals resilience. How will GMX V2’s architecture preempt similar vulnerabilities as adoption grows?