Deep Dive
1. Wintermute Liquidity Partnership (2025)
Overview
Fluid’s DAO is finalizing a 1-year deal with Wintermute, a top crypto market maker, to borrow 700k FLUID tokens ($6.22M at current prices) for liquidity provision. The partnership aims to improve accessibility on centralized exchanges (CEXs) and DeFi aggregators like 1inch and UniswapX (Governance Proposal).
What this means
- Bullish: Integration with Wintermute’s trading systems could drive 2–3x volume growth on Fluid DEX, accelerating progress toward its $10M annual revenue target.
- Risk: The $10 strike price in the repayment option has drawn criticism for undervaluing FLUID’s potential, with community proposals pushing for $15–20.
2. DEX V2 Launch (Late 2025)
Overview
Fluid plans to release DEX V2 by late 2025, targeting Ethereum’s “sandwich attack” volume—a $200M+/day market currently bypassed due to gas inefficiencies. The upgrade aims to reduce latency and costs to capture this arbitrage-driven activity (Announcement).
What this means
- Bullish: Success could position Fluid as Ethereum’s #1 DEX by volume, directly boosting protocol fees and FLUID’s utility.
- Neutral: Execution risks remain high, as competing DEXs like Uniswap are also optimizing for MEV resistance.
3. Multi-Chain Expansion (2025)
Overview
Fluid aims to deploy its lending and DEX protocols on 2–3 new chains in 2025, building on its Arbitrum success (60% user growth in June 2025). Targets include Base and Solana, with integrations like “Juplend x Jupiter” (Growth Strategy).
What this means
- Bullish: Cross-chain adoption could 3x Fluid’s TVL (currently $3B) and diversify revenue streams.
- Neutral: Liquidity fragmentation and chain-specific risks (e.g., Solana downtime) may offset gains.
Conclusion
Fluid’s roadmap balances immediate liquidity fixes (Wintermute) with ambitious technical upgrades (DEX V2) and ecosystem expansion. While bullish for adoption, the $10 strike price debate highlights governance risks. Will improved market-making offset dilution concerns, or does the DAO need stricter terms to align incentives?