“1M $GLMR is on the line Aug 21-28th. One leaderboard. Play-to-prove-it.” – @MoonbeamNetwork (283K followers · 1.2M impressions · 2025-08-19 16:38 UTC) View original post What this means: This is bullish for GLMR because the skill-based tournament could drive user engagement and showcase Moonbeam’s gaming infrastructure, potentially attracting developers and players to the ecosystem.
“All transaction fees are now 100% burned… increasing deflationary pressure.” – @MoonbeamNetwork (283K followers · 89K impressions · 2025-07-18 09:45 UTC) View original post What this means: This is bullish for GLMR because full fee burns reduce circulating supply growth, benefiting long-term holders as network usage increases.
“Capped linear inflation model (max 60M GLMR/year) + cross-chain bridge support implemented.” – @MoonbeamNetwork (283K followers · 64K impressions · 2025-07-07 16:18 UTC) View original post What this means: This is bullish for GLMR because the inflation cap provides supply predictability, while enhanced bridges could improve liquidity flows across Moonbeam’s Polkadot-connected ecosystem.
Conclusion
The consensus on Moonbeam is bullish, driven by ecosystem growth (221% QoQ transaction surge), deflationary tokenomics, and high-profile gaming initiatives. However, GLMR’s price remains -57% YoY despite these developments, suggesting market skepticism about execution risks. Watch the GLMR burn rate post-tokenomics change and participant metrics from the GLMillionaiRe tournament ending August 28th for near-term catalysts.
What is the latest news on GLMR?
TLDR
Moonbeam balances technical upgrades with gaming momentum while facing mixed staking yields. Here’s the latest:
Runtime 3800 Upgrade (15 August 2025) – Capped inflation and cross-chain bridges go live.
GLMillionaiRe Tournament Launch (19 August 2025) – 1M GLMR prize pool targets Web3 gaming growth.
Bitvavo Staking Rate Cut (4 August 2025) – Flex staking APY for GLMR drops to 0.5%.
Deep Dive
1. Runtime 3800 Upgrade (15 August 2025)
Overview: Moonbeam’s Runtime 3800 introduced a capped linear inflation model, limiting new GLMR emissions to 60M annually once supply hits 1.2B (currently 1.19B). It also activated bridges with Moonriver and testnets, plus XCM v1 compatibility for smoother cross-chain messaging.
What this means: This is bullish for GLMR’s scarcity narrative, as reduced inflation could ease sell pressure long-term. Enhanced bridges may boost interoperability with Ethereum and Polkadot ecosystems, though adoption metrics (e.g., cross-chain volume) need monitoring. (Moonbeam Network)
2. GLMillionaiRe Tournament Launch (19 August 2025)
Overview: Moonbeam partnered with N3mus Foundation to launch GLMillionaiRe, a skill-based gaming tournament offering 1M GLMR (~$68,200) in prizes. The event uses onchain score tracking and zero-gas onboarding via Sequence.
What this means: This reinforces Moonbeam’s focus on high-engagement Web3 gaming over speculative NFT models. Success could attract developers and users, but GLMR’s price remains sensitive to post-event sell pressure from winners. (Moonbeam Network)
3. Bitvavo Staking Rate Cut (4 August 2025)
Overview: Bitvavo reduced GLMR’s Flex staking APY to 0.5% (no lock-up) and Fixed staking to 3.00% (30-day lock), aligning with broader yield declines in proof-of-stake assets.
What this means: Lower yields may reduce passive investor appeal short-term, but reflect market normalization. GLMR’s 24h volume surged 97% recently, suggesting speculative interest outweighs staking dynamics. (Bitvavo)
Conclusion
Moonbeam is doubling down on gaming and deflationary tokenomics while navigating shifting staking yields. Will GLMillionaiRe’s prize pool translate into sustained network activity, or will the focus on burning fees outweigh adoption hurdles?
What is next on GLMR’s roadmap?
TLDR
Moonbeam’s development continues with these milestones:
Cross-Chain Bridge Activation (Q4 2025) – Finalizing interoperability with Moonriver and testnets.
DataHaven Integration (Late 2025) – Expanding decentralized AI storage via EigenLayer.
Gaming Hub Expansion (Ongoing) – Weekly tournaments and LATAM-focused growth.
Deep Dive
1. Cross-Chain Bridge Activation (Q4 2025)
Overview: The Runtime 3800 upgrade introduced bridge support between Moonbeam, Moonriver, and testnets, with full activation expected in Q4 2025. This enhances cross-chain asset transfers and aligns with Moonbeam’s interoperability focus.
What this means: This is bullish for GLMR because seamless bridging could attract Ethereum and Polkadot developers, increasing network usage. However, delays in deployment or security vulnerabilities pose risks.
2. DataHaven Integration (Late 2025)
Overview: DataHaven, a decentralized AI storage platform secured by EigenLayer, aims to launch a native bridge to Moonbeam. The project allocates 50% of its tokenomics to the community, per July 2025 updates.
What this means: This is neutral-to-bullish, as it expands GLMR’s utility (e.g., re-staking for security) and storage use cases. Success depends on adoption by dApps and AI projects, which remains uncertain.
3. Gaming Hub Expansion (Ongoing)
Overview: Moonbeam’s Gaming Hub targets LATAM markets like Brazil, with weekly tournaments via partners like N3mus and Evrloot. Over 100,000 transactions were recorded in July 2025 alone (source).
What this means: This is bullish because gaming drives user acquisition and transaction volume. Bearish risks include competition from rival chains and fluctuating player retention.
Conclusion
Moonbeam’s roadmap emphasizes interoperability (bridges), utility expansion (DataHaven), and regional ecosystem growth (gaming). While technical upgrades strengthen infrastructure, adoption hinges on developer traction and user engagement. Will cross-chain bridges solidify Moonbeam as the default gateway between Ethereum and Polkadot?
What is the latest update in GLMR’s codebase?
TLDR
Moonbeam’s codebase saw major upgrades in Q2/Q3 2025, focusing on scalability, cross-chain efficiency, and tokenomics.
Capped Inflation Model (15 August 2025) – Limits annual GLMR issuance to 60M once supply hits 1.2B.
Bridge & XCM Upgrades (15 August 2025) – Enhanced cross-chain interoperability with Moonriver and testnets.
Overview: Runtime 3800 introduced a linear inflation cap to curb GLMR’s supply growth. Annual issuance is capped at 60M GLMR once circulating supply reaches 1.2B (currently ~1B).
This replaces the previous variable inflation model, aligning with long-term sustainability goals. The change reduces sell pressure from unlimited supply growth while maintaining staking incentives.
What this means: This is bullish for GLMR because it introduces predictable tokenomics, potentially increasing scarcity as network usage grows. (Source)
2. Bridge & XCM Upgrades (15 August 2025)
Overview: Runtime 3800 added native support for bridges between Moonbeam, Moonriver, and testnets, alongside XCM v1 compatibility for cross-chain messaging.
The upgrade enables seamless asset transfers and smart contract calls across connected chains. GMP (General Message Passing) compatibility allows Moonbeam to interact with non-Polkadot ecosystems like Cosmos and Solana.
What this means: This is neutral-to-bullish, as improved interoperability could drive more cross-chain activity, but depends on partner chain adoption. (Source)
3. Runtime 3700 Rollout (June 2025)
Overview: June’s upgrade doubled block size (5MB → 10MB), reduced PoV data costs by ~50%, and enabled treasury spending of bridged assets like xcUSDC.
Developers faced breaking changes, including +1,670 gas per precompile call and deprecated storage names in the identity pallet. Node operators needed client v0.45.0 for compatibility.
What this means: This is bullish long-term – cheaper complex transactions and expanded treasury utility offset short-term dev migration costs. (Source)
Conclusion
Moonbeam’s 2025 upgrades prioritize sustainable growth (inflation cap), cross-chain expansion (XCM v1), and developer experience (larger blocks). With gas fees down 75% YTD and transactions up 221% QoQ, these changes aim to cement its position as Polkadot’s EVM hub.
Could capped inflation turn GLMR into a deflationary asset during high-usage periods? Monitor burn rates vs. staking rewards post-upgrade.