Latest Moonbeam (GLMR) News Update

By CMC AI
26 September 2025 01:00PM (UTC+0)

What are people saying about GLMR?

TLDR

Moonbeam’s community juggles tech upgrades and exchange woes. Here’s what’s trending:

  1. Capped inflation model sparks deflation hopes

  2. 1M GLMR gaming prize pool fuels ecosystem hype

  3. OKX delisting rattles liquidity outlook

  4. Fee burn overhaul tightens tokenomics

Deep Dive

1. @MoonbeamNetwork: Runtime 3800 Upgrade Goes Live Bullish

“Max 60M GLMR/year after supply reaches 1.2B”
– @MoonbeamNetwork (7 Jul 2025 4:18 PM UTC)
View original post
What this means: The new capped inflation model (down from uncapped) could stabilize long-term supply growth while cross-chain bridge enhancements improve Moonbeam’s Polkadot interoperability. Combined with GMP+XCM v1 compatibility, this strengthens developer appeal.

2. @MoonbeamNetwork: GLMillionaiRe Tournament Launch Bullish

“1M $GLMR prize pool… skill-based tournament”
– @MoonbeamNetwork (19 Aug 2025 4:38 PM UTC)
View original post
What this means: The 7-day gaming event (21-28 Aug) drove 300K+ transactions in July and could boost network activity metrics. However, the 1M GLMR prize distribution (~1% of circulating supply) creates short-term sell pressure risk post-event.

3. @OKX: GLMR Spot Pairs Delisting Bearish

Delisting GLMR/USDT and GLMR/USDⓈ on 8 Sept 2025
– @OKX (1 Sep 2025 8:00 AM UTC)
View announcement
What this means: OKX handled ~3% of GLMR’s $4.3M daily volume. The delisting reduces accessible liquidity, though Upbit’s June listing (+145% volume spike) partly offsets this. Monitor turnover rates post-8 Sept.

4. @MoonbeamNetwork: 100% Fee Burn Implemented Bullish

“All transaction fees now permanently burned”
– @MoonbeamNetwork (18 Jul 2025 9:45 AM UTC)
View original post
What this means: Up from 80% burn previously, this could remove ~1.2M GLMR annually at current transaction levels (64K/day). With 574M GLMR burned YTD, accelerated deflation could counter OKX delisting impacts.

Conclusion

The consensus on Moonbeam is mixed, balancing bullish protocol upgrades against bearish exchange liquidity shifts. While gaming traction and deflationary mechanics support fundamentals, the OKX delisting highlights altcoin market fragility. Watch the 30-day net inflow/outflow ratio post-GLMillionaiRe for signals about retail vs institutional holder behavior.

What is the latest news on GLMR?

TLDR

Moonbeam navigates exchange delistings while advancing gaming and tokenomics. Here are the latest updates:

  1. OKX Delists GLMR Pairs (1 September 2025) – Spot trading halted on a major exchange, reducing liquidity access.

  2. GLMillionaiRe Gaming Launch (19 August 2025) – 1M GLMR prize tournament drives Web3 gaming adoption.

  3. Capped Inflation Model (15 August 2025) – New tokenomics limit annual GLMR supply growth to 60M post-1.2B total.

Deep Dive

1. OKX Delists GLMR Pairs (1 September 2025)

Overview:
OKX removed GLMR/USDT and GLMR/USDC spot trading pairs on 8 September 2025, citing failure to meet liquidity/volume criteria. Deposits halted 1 September, withdrawals end 1 December.

What this means:
This is bearish for GLMR because OKX accounted for ~15% of its 24H volume pre-delisting, potentially reducing liquidity and retail access. However, GLMR remains listed on Binance, Kraken, and KuCoin, softening the blow. (OKX)

2. GLMillionaiRe Gaming Launch (19 August 2025)

Overview:
Moonbeam’s skill-based gaming tournament GLMillionaiRe launched with $450K+ in GLMR prizes, leveraging partnerships with N3MUS and Sequence for onchain fairness tracking.

What this means:
This is bullish for GLMR because it showcases Moonbeam’s Web3 gaming infrastructure, attracting developers and users. The event aligns with Q3’s 149% gaming transaction growth, signaling ecosystem traction. (Moonbeam)

3. Capped Inflation Model (15 August 2025)

Overview:
Runtime 3800 introduced a linear inflation cap of 60M GLMR/year once circulating supply hits 1.2B (current: 1.01B). This replaces previous uncapped parachain bond reserves.

What this means:
This is neutral-to-bullish for GLMR because it balances deflationary fee burns (100% since July 2025) with controlled supply growth, improving long-term scarcity mechanics. (Moonbeam)

Conclusion

Moonbeam faces mixed signals: exchange delistings pressure short-term liquidity, while gaming adoption and smarter tokenomics strengthen fundamentals. Will Polkadot’s ecosystem revitalization offset centralized exchange headwinds?

What is next on GLMR’s roadmap?

TLDR

Moonbeam's development continues with these milestones:

  1. Cross-Chain Bridge Activation (Q4 2025) – Live interoperability between Moonbeam, Moonriver, and testnets.

  2. DataHaven Integration (Late 2025) – Expanding decentralized AI storage via EigenLayer.

  3. Gaming Ecosystem Expansion (2026) – Doubling down on LATAM markets like Brazil.

Deep Dive

1. Cross-Chain Bridge Activation (Q4 2025)

Overview:
Moonbeam’s Runtime 3800 upgrade introduced compatibility for Generalized Message Passing (GMP) and XCM v1, setting the stage for seamless cross-chain communication. The upcoming bridge activation will connect Moonbeam, Moonriver, and testnets, enabling asset transfers and smart contract interactions across ecosystems.

What this means:
This is bullish for GLMR because enhanced interoperability could attract developers seeking multi-chain flexibility, potentially increasing network utility. However, delays in bridge security audits or adoption bottlenecks pose risks.

2. DataHaven Integration (Late 2025)

Overview:
DataHaven, Moonbeam’s decentralized AI storage platform, plans to launch a native bridge for trustless asset storage and compute operations. The platform allocates 50% of its token supply to community incentives, with GLMR acting as a re-staking asset for network security via EigenLayer.

What this means:
This is neutral-to-bullish for GLMR, as re-staking mechanisms could boost token demand. However, competition from established storage projects like Filecoin and technical complexity may slow adoption.

3. Gaming Ecosystem Expansion (2026)

Overview:
Moonbeam’s Moonrise campaign prioritizes gaming growth in emerging regions like Brazil, supporting projects like Evrloot and N3MUS. Over 40,000 matches were hosted in Q3 2025, with $11,400+ in player rewards distributed.

What this means:
This is bullish for GLMR because gaming drives high transaction volumes and user onboarding. Success hinges on retaining developers amid broader Web3 gaming sector volatility.

Conclusion

Moonbeam’s roadmap balances infrastructure upgrades (bridges, storage) with ecosystem growth (gaming, LATAM). While technical milestones could enhance utility, adoption risks persist. Will cross-chain bridges and gaming partnerships offset GLMR’s -69% annual price decline?

What is the latest update in GLMR’s codebase?

TLDR

Moonbeam’s codebase recently introduced upgrades focused on scalability, cross-chain infrastructure, and tokenomics.

  1. Capped Inflation Model (15 August 2025) – Limits annual GLMR issuance to 60M once supply hits 1.2B.

  2. Bridge & XCM Upgrades (15 August 2025) – Enhanced cross-network interoperability and compatibility.

  3. Runtime 3700 Overhaul (22 June 2025) – Bigger blocks, lower fees, and governance flexibility.

Deep Dive

1. Capped Inflation Model (15 August 2025)

Overview:
Runtime 3800 implemented a capped linear inflation model, capping annual GLMR issuance at 60M once total supply reaches 1.2B. This aims to balance ecosystem growth with long-term token scarcity.

What this means:
This is bullish for GLMR because it introduces predictable supply dynamics, reducing sell pressure from unchecked inflation while retaining flexibility for network incentives. Node operators and stakers face no immediate changes, but developers benefit from clearer tokenomics.
(Source)

2. Bridge & XCM Upgrades (15 August 2025)

Overview:
New bridge support between Moonbeam, Moonriver, and testnets went live, alongside GMP (General Message Passing) and XCM v1 compatibility upgrades.

What this means:
This is neutral-to-bullish for GLMR as it strengthens Moonbeam’s role as a cross-chain hub. Developers gain smoother interoperability tools, but adoption depends on partner chain integration. Users may see faster asset transfers between networks.
(Source)

3. Runtime 3700 Overhaul (22 June 2025)

Overview:
Runtime 3700 doubled block size (5MB → 10MB), reduced PoV data costs by ~50%, and enabled the Treasury to distribute bridged assets like xcUSDC.

What this means:
This is bullish for GLMR because heavier dApps can now run cheaper, attracting developers. End-users benefit from lower fees for complex transactions like XC-20 transfers. Governance participants gain new flexibility in fund allocation.
(Source)

Conclusion

Moonbeam’s recent codebase updates prioritize sustainable growth (capped inflation), cross-chain utility (bridge/XCM upgrades), and scalability (larger blocks). These align with its vision as a Polkadot-EVM interoperability hub. Will these upgrades catalyze developer migration from higher-fee chains?

CMC AI can make mistakes. Not financial advice.