Deep Dive
1. Rebranding to Nomina (Mixed Impact)
Overview:
Omni Network will rebrand as Nomina (NOM) on October 1, 2025, with OMNI tokens automatically converting at a 1:75 ratio. Exchanges like Bitvavo and Phemex will suspend OMNI trading by September 26, forcing holders to migrate or sell. Historically, OMNI surged 50% monthly after its August rebrand announcement (Coinspeaker), but the current swap’s 75:1 ratio risks dilution concerns.
What this means:
Short-term uncertainty could pressure prices as traders exit OMNI ahead of the swap. However, Nomina’s relaunch as an Ethereum-native interoperability hub might reignite developer interest if cross-rollup adoption accelerates post-migration.
2. Exchange Delistings (Bearish Impact)
Overview:
Major exchanges (KuCoin, BitTap, OrangeX) are delisting OMNI perpetual contracts and spot pairs between September 22–26. For example, KuCoin will auto-liquidate OMNI margin positions on September 24, potentially flooding the market with sell orders. Similar delistings in July 2025 saw OMNI drop 30% in a week (KuCoin).
What this means:
Reduced liquidity and forced position closures could push OMNI below its $3.55 support. However, NOM’s anticipated October 1 relisting on these platforms might offset losses if migration proceeds smoothly.
3. Technical Setup (Bullish Bias)
Overview:
OMNI is testing a 49-day descending resistance trendline near $3.60. A breakout could target $4.20 (38.2% Fib level) or $10–$11 by year-end (CCN). The MACD histogram turned positive on September 16, and the RSI (49.03) shows room for upside.
What this means:
A daily close above $3.73 would confirm bullish momentum, but failure risks a fall to $2.94 (September 1 low). Traders are watching the 200-day EMA ($3.93) as a key reversal signal.
Conclusion
OMNI’s fate hinges on whether Nomina’s relaunch outweighs delisting-driven sell pressure. Short-term, the $3.55–$3.60 zone is critical: breakdowns could accelerate declines, while a breakout might attract swing traders. Will NOM’s October debut validate Omni’s interoperability thesis—or fade as a rebranding gimmick?