Latest P2P Solutions foundation (P2PS) News Update

Deep Dive

1. @CryptoWhale2025: “P2PS undervalued vs competitors” – bullish

“P2PS trading at just $412 with REAL enterprise clients? Competitors like FIL at $120 with half the utility. $1T market cap incoming when institutions wake up”
– @CryptoWhale2025 (28.4K followers · 126K impressions · 2025-09-16 18:32 UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is bullish for P2PS because the comparison to Filecoin’s $120 price (vs P2PS’ $412) ignores P2PS’ 10x larger total supply, making its $1.07T self-reported market cap already 23x Filecoin’s $46B cap. The argument hinges on institutional adoption accelerating.

2. @BlockchainSkeptik: “Self-reported supply = red flag” – bearish

“260M circulating supply self-reported? That’s 2.6% of total 10B tokens. Even if accurate, 97.4% still locked = perpetual sell pressure. Price can’t sustain $400s long-term”
– @BlockchainSkeptik (41.2K followers · 89K impressions · 2025-09-16 22:15 UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is bearish for P2PS because the project’s 10B total supply leaves 9.74B tokens potentially entering circulation. At current prices, full dilution would imply a $4.1T market cap – nearly matching Bitcoin’s current $4.06T total crypto market cap.

3. @DeFiDegenMaster: “Mainnet launch could make/break P2PS” – mixed

“P2PS mainnet goes live Oct 1 – either enterprise validators flock in (bullish) or the ‘500+ clients’ claim gets exposed (bearish). Either way, 75M token unlock that week = volatility”
– @DeFiDegenMaster (63.8K followers · 214K impressions · 2025-09-17 01:45 UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is neutral for P2PS because the mainnet launch (Oct 1) could validate or undermine its enterprise adoption narrative, while the 75M token unlock (2.8% of current supply) on Oct 5 risks diluting price support.

Conclusion

The consensus on P2PS is mixed, split between believers in its enterprise traction and skeptics of its tokenomics. While the 83% 90-day price surge shows momentum, the $4.1T fully diluted valuation and October’s token unlocks create asymmetric risk. Watch the mainnet’s validator participation rate (target: 500+ entities) and whether the team addresses supply transparency – two make-or-break catalysts in the next 15 days.

Deep Dive

1. Near-Term Roadmap (0–6 months)

• Completed June 2025 listing on Biconomy Exchange (P2PS.org) continues momentum from September 2024 KoinBX India listing
• No formally announced technical upgrades since 2021 blockchain integration completion
• Exchange dominance strategy appears active - 15+ trading venues added since 2019

2. Long-Term Vision (6+ months)

• License replacement program: Transition traditional software licenses to P2PS token access (ongoing since 2019)
• Enterprise adoption push: Targeting government, healthcare, and banking sectors needing interference-free comms
• Merchant ecosystem growth: Roadmap graphics suggest expanding token utility to 200+ countries

3. Critical Context

• Technical debt: Original 2010 push-system architecture now 15 years old, requiring modernization
• Regulatory exposure: India's KoinBX listing (2024) and planned global expansion invite compliance complexity
• Competitive landscape: Similar projects like Orchid Protocol (OXT) offer decentralized VPN alternatives

Conclusion

P2PS appears focused on exchange-driven liquidity and enterprise partnerships rather than technical upgrades, with its aging infrastructure posing both stability risks and modernization opportunities. How might the project balance its legacy architecture with evolving zero-trust security standards in coming quarters?

TLDR
No recent codebase updates for P2PS are visible in accessible data, with the last documented technical change being a 2019 smart contract migration.

1. 2019 migration adjusted token supply 100x while maintaining valuation
2. ERC-20 standard remains core infrastructure
3. No GitHub/technical docs found post-2019

Deep Dive

1. Release type & scope

The May 2019 update (P2PS Team) involved:
- Full smart contract migration on Ethereum
- 100x supply expansion (1B → 10B tokens) via decimal adjustment
- Etherscan-verified contract redeployment

This technical reset enabled microtransactions by lowering per-token price from $3 to $0.03 without altering market cap. The migration required token holders to swap old contracts for new ones.

2. Impact on users & devs

While backward compatibility wasn’t addressed, the update:
- Mandated manual token swaps via ERC-20 wallets
- Maintained Ethereum-based architecture
- Didn’t introduce new features beyond supply mechanics

No node upgrades or developer toolkit changes were mentioned, suggesting this was an economic adjustment rather than protocol evolution.

Conclusion

P2PS’s technical footprint remains anchored to its 2019 ERC-20 framework, with no visible code activity in standard tracking channels since then. How might the project’s reliance on legacy smart contracts impact its ability to integrate modern DeFi primitives like ERC-4337 account abstraction?