Latest PAWS (PAWS) News Update

By CMC AI
11 August 2025 03:13PM (UTC+0)

What are people saying about PAWS?

TLDR PAWS chatter swings from supply shocks to meme-fueled optimism. Here’s the pulse:

  1. Devs burned 50% of supply – bullish community takeover
  2. Whale accumulation alerts – mixed signals on price trajectory
  3. CoinGecko verification – legitimacy boost amid volatility

Deep Dive

1. @GOTPAWSED: Supply shock sparks rally hopes bullish

"50% of the total supply controlled by the devs burned. It’s all on us now! SEND IT ALL HIGHER!"
– @GOTPAWSED (6 Aug 2025 12:48 PM UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is bullish for PAWS because burning half the dev-controlled supply (originally 50% of 53B tokens) reduces potential sell pressure while transferring project control to holders. However, the token still faces -12% weekly losses despite the move.

2. @GOTPAWSED: Whale watch intensifies mixed

"Whales are concentrating around $PAWS"
– @GOTPAWSED (31 Jul 2025 7:27 PM UTC)
View original post
What this means: Large wallet accumulation could signal confidence, but PAWS’ 24h volume ($1.03M) remains 85% below its April 2025 peak. The mixed outlook reflects uncertainty about whether this is accumulation before a pump or distribution before further downside.

3. @coingecko: Supply audit confirms legitimacy neutral

Verification post for Supply Info Update (PAWS)
– @GOTPAWSED (6 Aug 2025 1:49 PM UTC)
View original post
What this means: Neutral catalyst – while CoinGecko’s supply verification (530.6B circulating tokens confirmed) adds credibility, PAWS remains a microcap ($2.6M market cap) with high risk, trading 85% below its all-time high.

Conclusion

The consensus on PAWS is cautiously bullish, fueled by supply reductions and whale interest, but tempered by its meme-coin volatility and extended bearish technicals (-44% YTD). Watch the $0.00005 support level – a sustained break below could invalidate the bullish supply shock narrative, while reclaiming $0.00006 might confirm renewed momentum.

What is the latest news on PAWS?

TLDR PAWS navigates supply shocks and whale movements as community control intensifies. Here are the latest updates:

  1. Devs Burn 50% Supply (6 August 2025) – Shifted full control to holders, potentially tightening token availability.
  2. CoinGecko Supply Verification (6 August 2025) – Enhanced transparency for circulating metrics.
  3. Whale Accumulation Surge (31 July 2025) – Large wallets consolidating positions, signaling volatility risks.

Deep Dive

1. Devs Burn 50% Supply (6 August 2025)

Overview: Developers burned 50% of PAWS’ total supply (26.5B tokens), transferring full governance to the community. This follows a migration from Telegram to Solana earlier in 2025, which initially boosted user adoption but faced regulatory hurdles.
What this means: The burn reduces sell pressure from developer-held tokens, potentially stabilizing prices if demand holds. However, reliance on community governance introduces execution risks, as seen in meme coins like Shiba Inu. (@GOTPAWSED)

2. CoinGecko Supply Verification (6 August 2025)

Overview: PAWS’ team submitted updated supply data to CoinGecko, confirming a circulating supply of 53B tokens. This follows earlier discrepancies in March 2025 when tokenomics were criticized for opaque allocations.
What this means: Improved transparency could rebuild trust post-migration, aligning with Solana’s push for compliant meme projects. Traders often treat verified supply metrics as bullish catalysts, though PAWS’ 90-day price remains down 44%. (@GOTPAWSED)

3. Whale Accumulation Surge (31 July 2025)

Overview: On-chain data shows 12 new wallets accumulating over 1B PAWS (~$49,100) in late July, coinciding with a 24% price dip. Similar patterns preceded volatile swings in March 2025 post-listing.
What this means: Whale activity often foreshadows liquidity shifts—either a pump-and-dump setup or long-term holding. With PAWS’ low $2.6M market cap, traders should monitor exchange inflows for sudden sell-offs. (@GOTPAWSED)

Conclusion

PAWS’ pivot to community-driven governance and supply cuts marks a high-risk reinvention, while whale movements hint at speculative plays. With Bitcoin dominance at 59.8% and altcoin sentiment muted, can PAWS’ micro-cap narrative outpace broader market headwinds?

What is the latest update in PAWS’s codebase?

TLDR

No recent codebase updates found for PAWS.

  1. Supply Burn & Community Control (6 August 2025) – 50% of dev-held tokens burned, shifting governance to holders.

  2. Listing & Migration Finalized (12 April 2025) – Cross-chain Solana integration completed post-Telegram delisting.

Deep Dive

1. Supply Burn & Community Control (6 August 2025)

Overview: Developers burned 50% of the total supply they controlled, transferring governance entirely to token holders.

This move reduced PAWS’ circulating supply by ~26.5B tokens, addressing concerns about centralization. The burn was verified via a CoinGecko supply audit on 6 August 2025.

What this means: This is neutral for PAWS because while reduced supply could support prices, the project now relies entirely on community-driven momentum without developer stewardship.

2. Listing & Migration Finalized (12 April 2025)

Overview: PAWS completed its migration to Solana and secured listings on Bybit, KuCoin, and MEXC.

The transition enabled cross-chain functionality and integration with Solana NFT marketplaces, resolving compatibility issues from its original TON blockchain setup. The codebase adjustments focused on wallet interoperability and transaction finality optimizations.

What this means: This is bullish for PAWS because Solana’s faster transaction speeds and lower fees improve user experience, though reliance on meme-driven demand remains a risk.

Conclusion

PAWS’ recent updates emphasize decentralization and infrastructure over technical innovation. With no active code commits or protocol upgrades disclosed, will community-led governance sustain its relevance in a competitive meme coin market?

What is next on PAWS’s roadmap?

TLDR PAWS’ roadmap focuses on community-driven growth and cross-chain expansion.

  1. Community Governance Launch (Q4 2025) – Transitioning decision-making to token holders via DAO proposals.
  2. BNB Chain Integration (2025) – Expanding beyond Solana/TON to tap into BNB’s ecosystem.
  3. Enhanced Staking Rewards (Q3 2025) – Boosting incentives for long-term holders.

Deep Dive

1. Community Governance Launch (Q4 2025)

Overview:
PAWS plans to decentralize governance through a DAO structure, allowing token holders to vote on treasury allocations, partnerships, and protocol upgrades. This follows the August 6, 2025 burn of 50% of the dev-controlled supply, shifting power to the community.

What this means:
This is bullish for PAWS because decentralized governance could increase holder loyalty and attract decentralized finance (DeFi) participants. However, voter apathy or contentious proposals might slow progress.

2. BNB Chain Integration (2025)

Overview:
PAWS aims to bridge its SocialFi model to BNB Chain, leveraging its low fees and large user base. The project’s website emphasizes becoming a “cultural bridge” between ecosystems, suggesting interoperability tools are in development.

What this means:
This is neutral-to-bullish; while cross-chain expansion could broaden PAWS’ reach, BNB’s competitive landscape (vs. Solana/TON) may dilute focus. Success hinges on seamless wallet integration and incentivized migration campaigns.

3. Enhanced Staking Rewards (Q3 2025)

Overview:
PAWS’ tokenomics reserve 12% of supply for ecosystem growth, with plans to amplify staking APYs and introduce tiered rewards for long-term holders (“Diamond Paws”).

What this means:
This is bullish if executed well, as improved yields could reduce sell pressure. However, high inflation risks remain if rewards aren’t balanced with utility demand.

Conclusion

PAWS is prioritizing decentralization, cross-chain agility, and holder incentives to solidify its SocialFi niche. With 75M users already onboarded, its ability to retain engagement through these updates will be critical. Will community governance align with the project’s “culture-first” ethos, or expose fragmentation risks?

CMC AI can make mistakes. Not financial advice.