Latest Peanut the Squirrel (PNUT) News Update

Deep Dive

1. @elonmusk: Viral Epstein jab fuels meme frenzy 🐿️ bullish

“Govt arrested (and killed) Peanut but no Epstein clients” – Musk’s July 9 post triggered an 80% volume spike and 10% price jump to $0.23 (NewsBTC).
– @elonmusk (168M followers · 13.7M impressions · 2025-07-09 15:30 UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is bullish short-term as Musk’s cultural relevance drives speculative buys, though gains reversed to $0.22 amid warnings about PNUT’s lack of utility.

2. @MOEW_Agent: Technicals hint at $0.22 breakout mixed

“Bulls accumulating near $0.1950 – breakout above $0.2020 targets $0.2200” (June 23 analysis). Current price $0.28 sits above this key level.
– @MOEW_Agent (12K followers · 45K impressions · 2025-06-23 12:05 UTC)
View original post
What this means: Neutral-bullish as price now tests higher resistance at $0.3041, but low volume raises concerns about sustainability.

3. @Binance: Exchange support meets skepticism bearish

Binance added PNUT as a loanable asset (June 18) and BYDFi listed perpetual contracts (Aug 27), but price fell 4% post-announcement. Robinhood’s August 5 listing saw PNUT drop 4.77% to $0.2163.
– @Binance (9.8M followers · 2.1M impressions · 2025-06-18 12:10 UTC)
View original post
What this means: Bearish divergence – institutional adoption hasn’t offset broader meme coin sell pressure, with PNUT down 90% from its 2024 ATH.

Conclusion

The consensus on $PNUT is mixed, balancing Elon-driven hype against fading momentum. While technical setups and exchange support offer glimmers, the token remains hostage to meme cycle volatility. Watch the $0.30 resistance level – a sustained break could reignite trader interest, but failure may confirm range-bound stagnation.

Deep Dive

1. BYDFi Listing (27 August 2025)

Overview: BYDFi listed PNUTUSDC perpetual contracts, enabling leveraged trading with a 0.00001 tick size and 75x maximum leverage. This follows similar listings for NEAR, NEO, and ORDI, positioning PNUT alongside established altcoins.
What this means: Derivatives access could amplify trading activity and liquidity, but high leverage risks volatility spikes. (BYDFi)

2. Pump.fun Liquidity Foundation (8 August 2025)

Overview: Solana memecoin platform Pump.fun launched the Glass Full Foundation to stabilize tokens like PNUT after its daily revenue fell 97% from January 2025 highs. PNUT’s $253M market cap made it a priority for liquidity support.
What this means: While intended to bolster price stability, the move reflects broader struggles in memecoin platforms, raising questions about long-term viability. (CoinMarketCap)

3. Robinhood Listing (5 August 2025)

Overview: Robinhood listed PNUT on its Advanced Trading platform alongside BONK and PENGU. Trading volumes rose initially, but prices remained flat, with gains under 20%.
What this means: Mainstream exposure could attract retail traders, but muted price action suggests skepticism or profit-taking. (CoinMarketCap)

Conclusion

PNUT’s recent exchange listings and liquidity initiatives highlight growing institutional recognition, but its meme-driven nature keeps volatility high. Will sustained growth require utility beyond viral narratives, or can social momentum alone propel it further?

Deep Dive

1. No Formal Roadmap (2024–2025)

Overview:
Multiple sources (CoinDesk, Bitcoinist) confirm PNUT lacks a documented roadmap, protocol, or utility. The project’s 2024–2025 trajectory hinges entirely on meme-driven narratives like the #JusticeForPeanut campaign and Elon Musk’s tweets.

What this means:
This is neutral for PNUT because meme coins often thrive without formal roadmaps, but it limits long-term sustainability. Price swings depend on viral moments rather than fundamentals.

2. Community-Driven Momentum (Ongoing)

Overview:
PNUT’s community actively fuels speculation through platforms like X (Twitter) and Pump.fun, with endorsements from figures like Elon Musk triggering short-term rallies. Recent listings on Robinhood (August 2025) and Binance Loans (June 2025) improved accessibility but did not alter its roadmap-free status.

What this means:
This is bullish for PNUT because exchange listings and social media hype can amplify trading volume and visibility. However, bearish risks emerge if viral momentum fades or newer meme coins overshadow it.

Conclusion

Peanut the Squirrel remains a pure meme play, with no technical upgrades or strategic initiatives disclosed. Its value hinges on cultural relevance and speculative trading. Will PNUT’s community sustain its momentum as the 2025 meme coin cycle evolves?

Deep Dive

1. No Protocol or Utility (2024–2025)

Overview: PNUT lacks a functional protocol, roadmap, or technical whitepaper, according to multiple sources (CoinDesk). Its codebase isn’t publicly tracked, and its Solana-based tokenomics focus purely on meme-driven trading.

What this means: This is neutral for PNUT because its value hinges on cultural relevance rather than technological innovation. Investors prioritize hype over fundamentals.

2. Community-Driven Mechanics (2025)

Overview: PNUT’s “on-chain mechanics” reward user interaction through meme-sharing and loyalty incentives, though these features are superficial and lack technical depth (CryptoNewsLand).

What this means: This is bearish for PNUT long-term, as the absence of tangible utility makes it vulnerable to sentiment shifts. Short-term gains depend on social media trends.

3. Speculative Momentum (July 2025)

Overview: A 10% price surge on July 9 followed Elon Musk’s viral tweet referencing squirrels and Epstein, showcasing PNUT’s reliance on external triggers (NewsBTC).

What this means: This is neutral for PNUT because such spikes are transient. The token’s codebase remains unchanged, leaving it exposed to volatility.

Conclusion

PNUT’s development trajectory remains stagnant, with no codebase updates or technical innovation since its inception. Its market performance is entirely decoupled from engineering efforts, relying instead on social narratives and speculative trading. Could PNUT’s community sustain relevance without technological evolution?