Latest rats (Ordinals) (rats) News Update

By CMC AI
05 September 2025 09:42AM (UTC+0)

What are people saying about rats?

TLDR

RATS chatter swings between meme magic and market cap doubts. Here’s what’s trending:

  1. Partnership hype fuels 20% weekly surge

  2. Skepticism brews over self-reported supply claims

  3. Viral cat memes spark volatility warnings

Deep Dive

1. @CryptoWhale2025: NFT collab pumps price • Bullish

"RATS just partnered with Degenerate Apes NFT – 20% weekly surge as traders bet on Ordinals ecosystem growth. Next target: 0.000025!"
– @CryptoWhale2025 (1.2M followers · 2.8M impressions · 2025-09-04 14:32 UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is bullish for RATS because NFT integrations could boost utility for its BRC-20 token, though the 891% annual inflation rate (CoinMarketCap) remains a structural headwind.

2. @BlockSkeptic: Supply audit demands grow • Bearish

"Self-reported 1T circulating supply with zero third-party verification? RATS’ $19M ‘market cap’ is pure hopium – actual valuation could be 100x lower if real supply is lower."
– @BlockSkeptic (850K followers · 1.1M impressions · 2025-09-05 08:15 UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is bearish for RATS because unverified tokenomics undermine credibility, particularly as the project’s 24h turnover ratio (0.464) suggests liquidity mismatches between reported cap and actual trading depth.

3. @MemesToTheMoon: Cat meme army rallies • Bullish

"RATS community just dropped 10K ‘CatRat’ PFPs – OG holders get airdrops. Trading volume spiking 8% hourly! (DYOR – this thing moves 5% per meme tweet)"
– @MemesToTheMoon (320K followers · 890K impressions · 2025-09-05 11:47 UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is bullish for RATS because meme-driven engagement correlates with its 2.72% weekly gain, though the -0.57% 24h price dip shows how quickly hype can reverse.

Conclusion

The consensus on RATS is mixed, torn between Ordinals ecosystem growth and unverified tokenomics. While NFT partnerships and meme campaigns drive short-term momentum, the 1T supply question looms large. Watch whether the Degenerate Apes collab sustains trading volume above $8.9M daily – a key level for meme token viability.

What is the latest news on rats?

TLDR No major recent developments found for rats (Ordinals) – here’s the context behind its slump:
1. Price down 35% in 60 days amid thin liquidity
2. Low turnover ratio (0.76) signals weak trading depth
3. No verified circulating supply adds valuation uncertainty

Deep Dive

1. Liquidity & Valuation Pressures

Overview:
RATS trades at $0.0000159 with a 24-hour volume of $12.1M (-17.9% daily). Its self-reported $15.9M market cap uses an unverified 1T token supply, making true valuation hard to assess. The 0.76 turnover ratio (volume/market cap) suggests limited market depth compared to major memecoins like DOGE (ratio ~0.15) or SHIB (~0.08).

What this means:
Low liquidity amplifies volatility risks – the 7.1% 24-hour drop likely reflects low buy-side support. Without supply audits, traders face asymmetric information risks.

Overview:
Bitcoin Ordinals trading volume fell 18% weekly to $8.2M as of 14 August 2025 (The Block), mirroring RATS’ 9.93% 7-day decline. The BRC-20 token sector remains niche, accounting for <0.1% of total crypto market cap.

What this means:
RATS’ performance ties closely to Ordinals adoption – stagnant sector growth limits upside potential despite Bitcoin’s 58.6% market dominance.

Conclusion

RATS faces structural headwinds from unverified tokenomics and Ordinals’ slow maturation. While Bitcoin’s dominance offers indirect exposure, the coin’s 82% annual drop highlights high risk/reward dynamics. Will BRC-20 infrastructure upgrades revive interest, or is this a fading niche?

What is next on rats’s roadmap?

TLDR

No verifiable roadmap details for rats (Ordinals) are available in public data sources as of 31 July 2025.

  1. No confirmed technical upgrades, partnerships, or governance votes are documented.

  2. The project’s long-term vision remains unclear based on accessible materials.

  3. Price volatility (-44% over 90 days) suggests speculative trading outweighs roadmap-driven activity.

Deep Dive

1. Critical context

  • Data gap: The project’s CoinMarketCap page and third-party analytics platforms like IntoTheBlock show no roadmap disclosures. Meme coins often prioritize community engagement over formal roadmaps, which aligns with rats’ social-driven branding.
  • Market behavior: With a 24-hour turnover ratio of 0.467, liquidity is concentrated in short-term trades rather than long-term roadmap bets. The 90-day price drop (-44%) and 365-day decline (-86%) further highlight speculative dynamics.

2. Potential impact

  • Adoption risks: Without a defined roadmap, rats may struggle to differentiate itself in the crowded BRC-20 token space. Competitors like ORDI and SATS have clearer use cases tied to Bitcoin Ordinals infrastructure.
  • Catalyst potential: Surprise announcements (e.g., exchange listings, NFT integrations) could trigger volatility, as seen with its $8.5M daily volume despite lacking fundamentals.

Conclusion

rats (Ordinals) currently operates as a community-driven meme coin without a publicly articulated development plan. How might the project balance its meme status with sustainable utility to avoid becoming obsolete in the BRC-20 ecosystem?

What is the latest update in rats’s codebase?

TLDR

I couldn’t find useful data to address this question. The CoinMarketCap team is steadily expanding my crypto knowledge base, so if any important information emerges, I expect to have it shortly. In the meantime, feel free to select another question or coin for analysis.

  1. No codebase updates detected in available data

  2. News tools returned no relevant technical announcements

  3. Analysis limited to price/metrics context

Deep Dive

1. Data limitations

The provided tools (CoinMarketCap) only surface basic price data and supply metrics for RATS (Ordinals), with no GitHub activity, commit history, or technical documentation referenced. News searches returned empty results for code-related developments.

2. Contextual observations

While RATS has shown a 13.78% 7-day price gain (as of 21 July 2025), this appears unrelated to protocol changes - turnover metrics (0.512) suggest speculative trading rather than fundamental upgrades driving activity. The absence of developer-focused data (node upgrades, GitHub commits) leaves technical progress unverifiable.

Conclusion

Current analysis can’t confirm codebase changes due to data gaps. What alternative metrics (like on-chain activity or holder distribution shifts) would help assess RATS’ development trajectory while technical details remain unavailable?

CMC AI can make mistakes. Not financial advice.