“TRUST down 30% in 1h – devs silent, liquidity draining. Same pattern as last year’s AnubisDAO rug. $0.0005 support broke – next stop $0.0002?” – @CryptoWhale2025 (89.2K followers · 412K impressions · 2025-09-03 20:15 UTC) View original post What this means: This is bearish for TRUST because comparisons to historical rug pulls (like AnubisDAO’s 2024 collapse) amplify sell-side pressure, especially with developers unresponsive.
“Unverified: TRUST team in talks with LayerBank for lending integration. If true, 999M supply could see utility-driven demand. Watching $0.0006 resistance.” – @DeFiQueen (142K followers · 678K impressions · 2025-09-03 21:03 UTC) View original post What this means: This is bullish for TRUST because partnerships with established DeFi platforms like LayerBank could validate its use case, though unconfirmed rumors carry high risk.
“TRUST’s ‘self-reported’ 999M circulating supply still unverified by CMC. Until audit, treat $0.0005 as speculative. Remember: 90% of self-reported caps are inflated.” – @BlockchainOrBust (54K followers · 198K impressions · 2025-09-03 19:47 UTC) View original post What this means: This is bearish for TRUST because unverified supply metrics undermine price stability, echoing concerns from projects like Worldcoin’s initial valuation disputes.
Conclusion
The consensus on TRUST is mixed, balancing partnership hopes against rug pull fears and supply skepticism. Watch for CMC’s circulating supply audit – a verification could ease sell-side pressure, while delays may intensify doubts.
What is the latest news on TRUST?
TLDR
No material news has emerged about Trust The Process (TRUST) in the past 14 days, with its last major update being a BitMart exchange listing in January 2025.
6-month-old listing: TRUST was added to BitMart in January 2025 but shows no recent catalysts.
Persistent downtrend: TRUST has declined 38% in 90 days and 70% YoY.
Low liquidity: $2.39M 24h volume with a turnover ratio of 3.3 signals thin markets.
Deep Dive
1. Business & partnerships
BitMart announced TRUST’s listing on January 3, 2025, with trading going live on January 6 (BitMart Team). The token was added to the MEME and SOL trading zones with a TRUST/USDT pair. However, the listing failed to reverse TRUST’s long-term bearish trajectory, with the token down 38% since the event.
2. Market metrics
TRUST’s price sits at $0.000725 (July 18, 2025), down 70% YoY. Key metrics suggest weak demand: - Volume: $2.39M 24h volume (-3.17% daily price drop) - Supply dynamics: 100% of the 999M total supply is self-reported as circulating, raising transparency concerns. - Turnover: 3.3% ratio implies low liquidity, increasing slippage risks.
Conclusion
TRUST lacks recent developments and faces structural challenges like low liquidity and unverified supply data. What on-chain or partnership activity could reverse its multi-month downtrend?
What is next on TRUST’s roadmap?
TLDR
No verifiable roadmap details for Trust The Process (TRUST) are currently available.
No confirmed technical upgrades, partnerships, or governance votes disclosed
Project messaging focuses on abstract philosophy over concrete plans
Token’s -70% yearly decline aligns with lack of visible development
Deep Dive
1. Critical context
The project’s only public statement—“$TRUST the process and embrace the journey”—offers no actionable details (Trust The Process). This pattern suggests either:
Deliberate opacity: Common in meme coins prioritizing community sentiment over utility
Development stall: 90-day trading volume (-35%) and price (-35%) declines might reflect fading momentum
Resource constraints: All 999M tokens are circulating with $715K self-reported market cap, limiting treasury funds
2. Potential impact
Without roadmap clarity, TRUST faces two scenarios:
Bearish - Liquidity risk: 99%+ holders might be underwater given -70% yearly returns, increasing sell pressure on rebounds - No use case differentiation from 10K+ other meme tokens
Conclusion
TRUST’s trajectory currently depends more on broader market tides than project-specific developments. What measurable criteria would signal renewed developer or community commitment to this asset?