Latest Websea (WBS) News Update

Deep Dive

1. @webseaofficial: Price Rally to $1.51 Bullish

“WBS has surged to $1.51, 24h up +3.71%! The surge hasn’t stopped yet!”
– @webseaofficial (Official account · 17 July 2025 03:35 AM UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is bullish for WBS because breaking yearly highs often triggers algorithmic trading inflows and retail FOMO, though sustainability depends on broader market conditions.

2. @webseaofficial: August Burn of 2.16M WBS Bullish

“Burned this period: 2,165,156.28 WBS (+80K MoM). Total burned: 63.7M WBS.”
– @webseaofficial (Official account · 1 August 2025 07:26 AM UTC)
View original post
What this means: This is bullish for WBS because accelerating burns reduce sell pressure—63.7M tokens (21% of total supply) removed, tightening circulation as price climbs.

3. @webseaofficial: CertiK Security Score of 83.09 Neutral

“CertiK Skynet Score: 83.09/A. Market score: 88.15, Community: 90.64.”
– @webseaofficial (Official account · 12 August 2025 09:22 AM UTC)
View original post
What this means: Neutral for WBS—while a strong audit score reduces smart contract risks, the “Fundamentals” subscore of 76.7 suggests room for protocol maturity.

4. @Websea_CN: Weekly Staking Growth Bullish

“Weekly staking: +303K WBS. New holders: +1,341. Price: $1.115.” (Translated from Chinese)
– @Websea_CN (Chinese community · 1 September 2025 12:01 PM UTC)
View original post
What this means: Bullish for WBS—rising staking (9M+ total) and holder growth signal long-term commitment, though current $1.37 price suggests +23% upside to July’s $1.51 high.

Conclusion

The consensus on WBS is bullish, driven by price momentum, deflationary burns, and staking growth, though security fundamentals remain a watchpoint. Monitor the next monthly burn data (expected early October 2025) for supply reduction pace against price action.

Deep Dive

1. Next WBS Token Burn (1 October 2025)

Overview: Websea burns 10% of daily trading fees monthly to reduce WBS supply. The August 2025 burn destroyed 2.16M WBS (@webseaofficial), bringing cumulative burns to 63.7M (21% of total supply). The next burn is expected around 1 October, following its monthly schedule.
What this means: This is bullish for WBS because reduced supply amid steady demand could support price stability. However, effectiveness depends on sustained trading volume, which fell 2.4% weekly in early September.

2. C2C Expansion (Q4 2025)

Overview: Websea launched C2C trading on 1 September 2025, enabling direct crypto-fiat transactions. The platform aims to onboard more verified merchants and expand to Europe/Asia in Q4, targeting regions with high retail crypto adoption.
What this means: This is neutral-to-bullish for WBS because C2C could boost user growth and transaction volume, but success hinges on liquidity and regulatory approvals. The initial rollout saw 1,341 new WBS holders in its first week (@Websea_CN).

3. Regulatory Expansion (2026)

Overview: After securing licenses in the US (2023), Canada (2024), and Australia (2025), Websea plans EU/Asia regulatory filings in 2026. This aligns with its compliance-focused branding (@webseaofficial).
What this means: This is bullish long-term because licenses enable broader market access, but delays or rejections could stall growth. The 2025 Australia ASIC approval correlated with a 27% 30-day WBS price surge.

Conclusion

Websea’s roadmap prioritizes deflation (burns), accessibility (C2C), and compliance—a balanced strategy for sustainable growth. With WBS up 441% year-over-year, can its tokenomics and regulatory wins maintain momentum amid broader market volatility?

Deep Dive

1. Platform Growth Surge (1 September 2025)

Overview:
Websea’s weekly report (25–31 August) highlighted a 303,141 WBS increase in staking, 1,341 new holders, and $132.93M in spot trading volume. The platform added OKB and XPL listings and reported 3,002 subscriptions for its loss-protected copy-trading feature, driving $207.1M in follow-on contracts.

What this means:
Growing staking and user adoption signal confidence in WBS’ utility, while new listings expand trading opportunities. However, the current price of $1.115 (as of 31 August) reflects a -2.35% 24h dip, suggesting short-term profit-taking amid broader market volatility (Websea_CN).

2. August Token Burn (1 August 2025)

Overview:
Websea burned 2,165,156 WBS in August, an 80,190 WBS increase from July. Cumulative burns now total 63.7M WBS (21.2% of total supply), with on-chain verification ensuring transparency.

What this means:
Accelerated burns tighten supply, creating deflationary pressure that could support long-term price stability. The 27% 30-day price gain aligns with this trend, though recent volatility (-2.35% 24h) shows sensitivity to market-wide risk appetite (Websea).

3. Certik Security Upgrade (12 August 2025)

Overview:
Websea scored 83.09/100 (Grade A) in CertiK’s audit, excelling in community (90.64) and operations (88.82). This followed July’s Australian ASIC regulatory certification.

What this means:
Enhanced security and compliance reduce operational risks, attracting institutional interest. The audit coincided with a 4.63% price bump to $1.09, though momentum cooled amid broader crypto’s -3.24% 24h dip (Websea).

Conclusion

Websea’s trifecta of staking growth, aggressive token burns, and security upgrades positions WBS for sustained utility-driven demand. With 27% monthly gains outpacing Bitcoin’s +2.11%, can Websea’s ecosystem innovations offset macro market headwinds?

Deep Dive

1. Platform Updates vs. Protocol Changes

The latest Websea announcements (July 24–August 1, 2025) highlight operational changes rather than core protocol updates:
- New perpetual contracts for RAY and C tokens with 50x leverage
- ERC20 deposit/withdrawal resumptions for POL, GMT, ERA, and ARB
- Phase 34 token burn executed August 1, reducing WBS supply

These updates suggest engineering resources are directed toward exchange infrastructure and user incentives rather than modifying WBS’s underlying blockchain logic.

2. Development Activity Indicators

No code repositories, commit histories, or technical changelogs were accessible in the provided data. Typical signals of codebase activity – like GitHub pull requests, version numbering, or node upgrade requirements – remain unobserved.

Conclusion

Websea’s recent updates align with centralized exchange priorities (market expansion, liquidity incentives) rather than decentralized protocol development. How might WBS’s role evolve if the platform shifts focus toward decentralized exchange components or onchain governance?