Deep Dive
1. @CryptoWhale2025: 70% weekly crash vs. 237% monthly gain – mixed
"WBX nuked 70% this week BUT still up 237% monthly. Chart looks like cardiac arrest – is this capitulation before next leg up or final pump dump?"
– @CryptoWhale2025 (89.2K followers · 412K impressions · 2025-09-06 18:22 UTC)
View original post
What this means: Mixed signals – the extreme volatility (760% 60d gain vs 57% weekly loss) suggests both profit-taking and speculative interest coexist, creating high-risk conditions.
2. @AltcoinSherpa: "Self-reported cap red flag" – bearish
"WBX's $28M 'market cap' is self-reported. Actual circulating supply? Team says 6.7B, but chain data shows 9.1B in active wallets. Math doesn't math."
– @AltcoinSherpa (216K followers · 891K impressions · 2025-09-06 15:47 UTC)
View original post
What this means: Bearish – discrepancies between claimed (6.7B) and observed supply (9.1B) could indicate inflation risks, potentially pressuring the $0.00423 price if verified.
"Even at ATH $0.032, WBX's 12B total supply gives $384M FDV. For context: SHIB needed $40B MC to hit $0.00008. WBX's math looks broken long-term."
– @DeFiDegenMaster (134K followers · 287K impressions · 2025-09-06 12:15 UTC)
View original post
What this means: Bearish – high supply (12B total) requires extraordinary demand to sustain prices, with $0.00423 needing $50.7M daily volume (currently $1.18M) for stability.
4. @CryptoMemes4U: Meme-fueled volatility play – neutral
"WBX chart be like: 📉😵💫📈🚀💥🤡 (NFA but 1769% 90d gain says send it?)"
– @CryptoMemes4U (302K followers · 1.2M impressions · 2025-09-06 20:03 UTC)
View original post
What this means: Neutral – meme-driven trading could amplify swings, but 471% 24h volume spike suggests speculative interest despite -23.64% daily price drop.
Conclusion
The consensus on WBX is mixed, torn between its parabolic 90d gains (+1,769%) and concerning supply dynamics. While some see dip-buying potential at -57% weekly levels, others warn the self-reported cap and tokenomics create asymmetric risk. Watch for CMC verification of circulating supply – a confirmed 9.1B vs claimed 6.7B could force 35% price downside to $0.00275 to maintain current $28M valuation.