Satoshi

United

Satoshi Nakamoto

Biden

Bitcoin

President Biden in March <a href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/crypto-mining-tax-united-states-budget" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">released his budget proposal for fiscal year 2025</a>. In it, he proposed three changes to the way federal law operates with respect to cryptocurrency. There are some good changes, such as the application of existing securities regulations to crypto. But there is also&nbsp;one bad change — namely, a special tax on crypto mining.
Firstly, the proposal contains two regulatory changes. First is the elimination of a tax loophole that allows cryptocurrency traders to write off losses on assets they sell and then quickly rebuy. Second is the implementation of security loan nonrecognition rules to actively-traded crypto asset loans.
The first change simply expands existing rules for stock and bond trading to cryptocurrencies. This is a great example of the government creating an even playing field for similar asset classes without creating new cumbersome and bureaucratic regimes.
Related: <a href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-halving-wont-see-600-percent-return-adjust-your-strategy" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Bitcoin's halving won't see a 600% return this year — so adjust your strategy</a>
Currently, stocks sold at a loss cannot be re-purchased in less than 30 days. If traders repurchase those stocks, they cannot deduct the loss on their taxes — a practice known as&nbsp;<a href="https://cointelegraph.com/explained/what-are-wash-trading-and-money-laundering-in-nfts" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">wash trading</a>.
With crypto, the rule is more ambiguous. It isn’t clear under the current regulatory regime when traders can buy their crypto back, but they often do so in much less than 30 days. They realize their losses for tax purposes and then immediately buy those same crypto assets back, functionally realizing a loss without actually losing those assets. The discrepancy between stocks and crypto is a result of slow regulatory application and not because of fundamental differences between crypto and securities.
<figure><img src="https://s3.cointelegraph.com/uploads/2024-04/fd416f92-6019-4694-b047-74ef995044d0.jpg" alt="" title="">
 <figcaption style="text-align: center;">Sen. Cynthia Lummis has repeatedly voiced opposition to Biden's crypto tax on X. Sou
 </figcaption>
</figure>
The second modification follows a similar program and applies securities regulations to crypto trading, which operates very similarly. Though this is not to say crypto trading and traditional financial markets are one-for-one, the similarities allow policymakers to carry over regulation from traditional finance to crypto when appropriate. In this instance, when loaning out traditional securities, like pensions and mutual funds, the one making the loan will not be required to recognize losses and gains if they received back essentially the same securities. Extending this rule to digital assets will make many of these loans tax-free, like securities.
Both Biden administration proposals are examples of the expansion of regulatory applications without a new agency being created or undue burdens being applied to the budding crypto industry.
Unfortunately, Biden’s proposal for a crypto mining tax takes the opposite approach to crypto.
Bitcoin (<a href="https://cointelegraph.com/bitcoin-price" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">BTC</a>) exists on digital ledgers, which are hosted on a million computers. To update the ledger with new transactions, these millions of computers compete to validate those transactions. This is called mining, and the validating terminal is rewarded with Bitcoin.
Related: <a href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-maximalism-misguided-satoshi-nakamoto-maxi-plus" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Bitcoin maximalism is misguided — Satoshi Nakamoto was a 'Maxi Plus'</a>
Mining is essential to any decentralized cryptocurrency since it provides the incentive to host and update the Bitcoin ledger. Without mining, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies would need a centralized hub, like fintechs and online banking. The utility of a decentralized method for transferring assets is the removal of a single point of failure or control.
Biden’s proposal would impose a 30 percent tax on electricity used in all crypto mining, even if that electricity is off the grid and internally sourced. This would dramatically increase costs for mining in the United States, forcing many miners to operate overseas. Like <a href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/chinas-crypto-investment-trend-amid-regulations" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">China’s ban on crypto trading</a>, this will not lead to the end of American crypto usage. Instead, it will simply force innovators in the space to consider operating in countries with friendlier regulatory environments.
The plan seems clearly aimed at satisfying the environmental concerns many activists have expressed regarding crypto mining. But it is ill-conceived, making no distinction between electricity sourced privately and sustainably, and electricity leased from nonrenewable sources. The 30 percent threshold is also excessive, massively increasing the cost of crypto mining which could easily be offshored given crypto’s international reach.
The Biden administration shouldn’t soil its otherwise positive regulatory changes with a large punitive tax on mining. With the regulatory space in need of some massive, but common-sense, changes, it’s easy for the administration to score a win simply by applying rules used in securities trading to crypto. Some light-touch reforms in this area could be very beneficial in alleviating these issues.
<div>
 <div style="background: rgb(239, 239, 239); border: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding: 10px;">Isaac Schick is a policy analyst with the American Consumer Institute, a nonprofit research group based in Washington, D.C. He holds a master’s degree in public policy from California Polytechnic State University.
 </div>
</div>
This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Biden's mining tax is the least sensible part of his 2025 budget proposal

Cointelegraph

Other articles published on Apr 9, 2024

Green Satoshi Token (SOL) (GST) Price Prediction 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029 and 2030

Unisocks (SOCKS) Price Prediction 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029 and 2030

Ethereum zkSync Welcomes Circle’s USD Coin for Layer-2 Stability

Japanese Company Metaplanet Inc Stock Rockets Embracing ¥1 Billion Bitcoin Investment

Solana Targets April 15th to Address Transaction Failure Surge

Polkadot’s Network Reaches New Heights with 600,000 Active Addresses

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!