2024

Impact

Northern

James

The judge overseeing a billion-dollar class-action lawsuit against GitHub, OpenAI and Microsoft over the alleged unauthorized use of intellectual property (IP) to train the “GitHub Copilot” artificial intelligence (AI) coding software has partially dismissed the claims against the defendants.
This marks a win for Big Tech and the generative AI industry, which currently faces <a href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/open-ai-artificial-intelligence-deal-time-lawsuit-news-nonprofit">a number of related lawsuits</a>. 
<h2 id="doe-s-v-openai-github-microsoft">Doe(s) v. OpenAI/GitHub/Microsoft</h2>
The lawsuit’s complainants had <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2022/11/8/23446821/microsoft-openai-github-copilot-class-action-lawsuit-ai-copyright-violation-training-data" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow">alleged</a> that OpenAI “scraped” GitHub and used human-created coding snippets to train GitHub Copilot without permission, compensation or credit. According to the lawsuit, Copilot reproduced human-generated code line-for-line, and as such, the complainants were apparently <a href="https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/California_Northern_District_Court/4--22-cv-06823/DOE_1_et_al_v._GitHub_Inc._et_al/" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow">seeking</a> compensation in the amount of $1 billion. 
There are five anonymous complainants in the case, ostensibly representing the class suing, each labelled as “John Doe” in court documents released to the public so far. 
According to separate reports from <a href="https://news.bloomberglaw.com/litigation/openai-github-beat-digital-copyright-claims-from-programmers" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow">Bloomberg Law</a> and <a href="https://www.law360.com/articles/1855576" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow">Law360</a>, California Northern District Judge Jon S. Tigar dismissed the class claims stemming from the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Per Bloomberg Law, this is because the claimants “failed to show their code was reproduced identically.”
The dismissal appears to have been filed by Judge Tigar on June 24. Related documents show that, at the time, public access to the text of the filing was restricted — possibly due to the exposure of previously redacted names. It was evidently unsealed on Friday, July 5. 
<h2 id="impact-on-artificial-intelligence">Impact on artificial intelligence</h2>
The lawsuit was originally filed in 2022. At the time, it was largely viewed by analysts and pundits that the case would have far-reaching implications for tech. The Verge’s James Vincent, for example, <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2022/11/8/23446821/microsoft-openai-github-copilot-class-action-lawsuit-ai-copyright-violation-training-data" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow">wrote</a> that “the suit could have a huge impact on the wider world of artificial intelligence.”
In the same article, Vincent cited a pair of programmers purportedly behind the lawsuit who, at the time, was of the mindset that “we’re in the Napster-era of AI” and that “letting Microsoft use other’s code without attribution could kill the open source movement.”
Fast forward to July 2024, and it appears as though those claims have largely been dismissed. What this spells for Microsoft, OpenAI and GitHub remains unclear, but it could lead to an unfettering of the companies’ endeavors in the area of AI-generated coding.
Microsoft and OpenAI face several related lawsuits,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/27/business/media/new-york-times-open-ai-microsoft-lawsuit.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow">including</a> one from The New York Times with similarities to this case. Much like the programmers behind the coding lawsuit, The New York Times alleges that OpenAI used its IP to train its models and that those models sometimes produce outputs containing identical information. 
As to whether the recent ruling in favor of OpenAI, Microsoft and GitHub will have any bearing on that and/or other related cases remains to be seen. 
Related: <a href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/nyt-ai-artificial-intelligence-lawsuit-open-ai-demands-sources-every-article">New York Times AI lawsuit twist: OpenAI demands article sources</a>

Judge dismisses coders’ DMCA claims against Microsoft, OpenAI and GitHub

Table of Contents

Cointelegraph

Other articles published on Jul 7, 2024

Bitcoin: Michael Saylor has THIS to say about BTC’s volatility

House to Revisit Crypto Regulation Bill Vetoed by Biden

Bitcoin hits 5-month low, Mt. Gox begins repayments, Circle secures MiCA license | Weekly Recap

MoonBag Referral Rewards Show Notcoin and The Sandbox Investors What a Good Investment Looks Like!

Shiba Inu Whales On The Move Again As Bitcoin, Crypto Market Recover

Andrew Kang Offers Crypto Investment Tips

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!