Future

2024

Arbitrum

United

Uniswap

<p>Prometheum, U.S.-registered digital asset firm, has stirred controversy by classifying Uniswap’s UNI and Arbitrum’s ARB tokens as securities. This move, which expands the firm’s custodial services to include these tokens along with Ether (ETH), reflects a broader regulatory struggle within the cryptocurrency sector.</p>
<p>On August 21, 2024, Prometheum&nbsp;<a href="https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240821785704/en/Prometheum-Capital-Adds-Two-New-Digital-Asset-Securities-to-Custodial-Platform" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">announced</a>&nbsp;that it will add UNI and ARB to its custody platform, treating them as “digital asset securities.” This decision is set to roll out in the third quarter of the year, providing institutional clients with secure storage options for these tokens.</p>
<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter">
 <div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
  <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
   <p lang="en" dir="ltr">We’re excited to announce the addition of the following <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/digitalassetsecurities?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">#digitalassetsecurities</a>, Uniswap (UNI) and Arbitrum (ARB), to the Prometheum Capital custodial platform. Institutional and corporate clients will be able to custody Uniswap (UNI), Arbitrum (Arb) and Ethereum's Ether (ETH)…</p>— Prometheum (@PrometheumInc) <a href="https://twitter.com/PrometheumInc/status/1826270820286538082?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">August 21, 2024</a>
  </blockquote>
  <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 </div>
</figure>
<p>Prometheum Capital, the firm’s specialized broker-dealer arm, claims to be the only SEC-qualified custodian and broker-dealer for digital asset securities.</p>
<p>This classification aligns with the SEC’s interpretation but diverges from the prevailing industry perspective. Prometheum’s stance on UNI and ARB mirrors its earlier decision to classify Ether as a security—a move that has not been universally accepted.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-arbitrum-and-uniswap-tokens-classification-raises-eyebrows"><strong>Arbitrum and Uniswap Tokens Classification Raises Eyebrows</strong></h2>
<p>The decision to treat UNI and ARB as securities places Prometheum at odds with many in the cryptocurrency industry. Uniswap Labs, for instance, has vehemently&nbsp;<a href="https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2024/04/10/uniswap-vs-sec-uniswap-receives-wells-notice-from-sec/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">disputed the SEC’s classification of UNI</a>.</p>
<p>The decentralized exchange argues that UNI is not a security and should be treated similarly to Bitcoin (BTC) and ETH, which are seen as commodities by some regulators.</p>
<p>The broader context reveals a heated regulatory debate in the U.S. Many major cryptocurrency firms, including Coinbase and Ripple, are actively&nbsp;<a href="https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2022/09/28/ripple-vs-sec-is-sec-deviating-from-its-claim-of-xrp-being-a-security/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">challenging the SEC’s approach.</a></p>
<p>These companies argue that digital assets should be classified as commodities or digital goods rather than securities. This ongoing conflict creates uncertainty about the regulatory future for cryptocurrencies in the United States.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-regulatory-concerns-and-future-implications"><strong>Regulatory Concerns and Future Implications</strong></h2>
<p>The regulatory framework for digital assets is becoming more intricate as U.S. regulatory agencies hold differing viewpoints.</p>
<p>For example, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has classified&nbsp;<a href="https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2023/06/29/ethereum-co-founder-joseph-lubin-says-eth-is-a-commodity/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Ether as a commodity</a>, highlighting the jurisdictional overlap with the SEC. This misalignment between regulatory authorities adds to the complexity faced by cryptocurrency firms.</p>
<p>Prometheum’s decision to classify UNI and ARB as securities underscores its commitment to aligning with the SEC’s regulatory framework. Prometheum is setting itself apart as the sole firm officially recognized as a broker-dealer for crypto assets.</p>
<p>However, this role comes with significant risks. The firm’s conservative stance may place it in conflict with industry trends and potential legislative developments.</p>
<p>Prometheum’s move to include UNI and ARB in its custodial services highlights its adherence to a rigorous compliance strategy. While this choice aligns with the SEC’s vision, it has sparked considerable debate within the cryptocurrency sector.</p>
<p>The outcome of ongoing legal battles and regulatory discussions will likely shape the future landscape for cryptocurrencies in the United States.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2024/08/22/uniswap-arbitrum-labelled-as-securities-by-this-firm-why/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Uniswap, Arbitrum Labelled as Securities By This Firm: Why?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.thecoinrepublic.com" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">The Coin Republic</a>.</p>

Uniswap, Arbitrum Labelled as Securities By This Firm: Why?

Table of Contents

Thecoinrepublic.com

Other articles published on Aug 22, 2024

Will This be the Biggest Meme Coin ICO of the Summer? Playdoge Presale Concludes in 4 Days

Poodlana Primed To Skyrocket Amid Major Exchange Listing Announcement

Altcoin Season: Top Micro-Cap Altcoins to Watch

BTC Price Analysis: Why $66K Level Is Important To BTC

What is Neutron (NTRN) Coin?

Binance and CZ Face Lawsuit in Seattle Federal Court Over Alleged Money Laundering Practices

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!