2024

Million

WazirX

Liminal Custody, the erstwhile security partner of WazirX crypto exchange, has claimed in a statement that the exchange management still has Rs 420 crores worth of user funds under the custody of Liminal, even three months after the Rs 2000 crore hack and a public fallout between the two. Liminal has also accused WazirX management of running a misinformation campaign by squarely blaming them for the hack. 
<a href="https://www.cryptotimes.io/2024/09/09/liminal-custody-insists-rs-2000-crore-hack-was-from-wazirx/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Liminal Custody</a> has also criticized WazirX management for trying to allegedly confuse users and Singapore Court by releasing 240,000 public wallet addresses in their affidavit. Liminal Custody stated that WazirX had near $400 Million or Rs 3363 crore of user funds before the July 18 cyber hack. Almost 45% user funds amounting to $234 Million or Rs 2000 crore were stolen in the cyber hack that occurred on a cold multi-sig wallet of WazirX under the <a href="https://www.liminalcustody.com/blog/grant-thornton-affirms-liminal-security/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">security infrastructure</a> of Liminal Custody. 
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow"> 
 “Even 75 days after the hack, WazirX was still holding over USD 175 Million in assets on Liminal’s platform. In fact, as of today, USD 50 Million of their assets continue to remain on wallets accessed via Liminal Infrastructure,” read an official statement from Liminal Custody. 
</blockquote> 
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow"> 
 Speaking to The Crypto Times, a spokesperson for Liminal Custody said, “Rather than sharing a detailed post mortem, WazirX instead chose to eschew responsibility by publicly attributing blame to Liminal through a social media post mere hours after the breach – a post they later retracted. This impulsive finger-pointing, combined with their persistent lack of transparency and accountability, continues to not only muddy the waters but has also inflicted lasting damage to industry trust and security protocols.” 
</blockquote> 
Meanwhile, WazirX co-founder Nischal Shetty acknowledged that some of the user funds are still remaining with third party exchanges and old custodians, stating that his <a href="https://www.cryptotimes.io/2024/10/21/nischal-says-wazirx-finding-it-difficult-to-work-with-any-exchange/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">exchange is having difficulty</a> in searching for an exchange that will accept all crypto tokens they have. 
<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter">
 <div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper"> 
 <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
 POR work is ongoing. Team is aiming to complete it asap so we can share it with everyone. There have been false claims circulating that funds were moved to exchanges to trade! Funds were moved to some exchanges because we are still in the process of onboarding a custodian. This…— Nischal (Shardeum) 🔼 (@NischalShetty) <a href="https://twitter.com/NischalShetty/status/1848584348859044078?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" target="_blank" rel="noopener">October 22, 2024</a>
 </blockquote> 
 </div>
</figure> 
WazirX has found itself at the center of controversy once again as its ongoing Proof-of-Reserve (POR) process encounters delays. The company, currently working to finalize its POR, has faced criticism for transferring funds to third-party exchanges like Bybit that remain unregistered in India.&nbsp; 
These actions have led to accusations of improper conduct, with some in the crypto community labeling the move as a potential case of money laundering. 
<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter">
 <div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper"> 
 <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
 Isn't this money laundering <a href="https://twitter.com/dir_ed?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" target="_blank" rel="noopener">@dir_ed</a>? Mr.Nischal sending Indian money to Chinese companies without user consent?<a href="https://t.co/kkWjulCQnH" target="_blank">https://t.co/kkWjulCQnH</a>— Justice for WazirX Users (@IndiasCrypto) <a href="https://twitter.com/IndiasCrypto/status/1848393840677306648?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" target="_blank" rel="noopener">October 21, 2024</a>
 </blockquote> 
 </div>
</figure> 
In an official statement, the WazirX team acknowledged that funds had indeed been moved to certain exchanges but stressed that this was part of an interim solution.&nbsp; 
According to the WazirX team, onboarding a custodian is a complex process, particularly because many custodians don’t support all tokens. As a result, WazirX has opted to temporarily use third-party exchanges for custody until they find a more suitable alternative. 
However, not everyone is convinced. Several prominent figures within the cryptocurrency community have voiced their concerns, with one individual accusing WazirX of “daylight money laundering.”&nbsp; 
<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter">
 <div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper"> 
 <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
 This is daylight money laundering (75 Million $ USD) by one of the most prominent cryptocurrency exchange in India which was FIU compliant. As the amount in question is more than 50 Cr, users can also approach ED to file cases. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WazirX?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" target="_blank" rel="noopener">#WazirX</a>— Bibek Mishra (@BibekM) <a href="https://twitter.com/BibekM/status/1848429035669623062?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" target="_blank" rel="noopener">October 21, 2024</a>
 </blockquote> 
 </div>
</figure> 
Some have even suggested that the <a href="https://www.cryptotimes.io/2024/10/18/delhi-high-court-issues-notices-to-fiu-and-ed-regarding-wazirx-hack/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Enforcement Directorate (ED)</a> could investigate the exchange based on these fund transfers to unregistered entities. Critics recall previous scrutiny from Indian authorities, and this latest development has reignited fears of legal action. 
As the situation unfolds, WazirX will need to address both regulatory and community concerns to rebuild trust. Until the Proof-of-Reserve process is completed and all funds are securely managed under a custodian, the exchange remains in a challenging position, balancing between operational needs and public skepticism. 
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow"> 
 Also Read: <a href="https://www.cryptotimes.io/2024/10/21/wazirx-sent-rs-606-crores-of-user-funds-to-unregistered-chinese-exchange/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">WazirX Submitted Dubious Wallet Addresses to Singapore Court; Here’s Proof</a> 
</blockquote>

Liminal Says WazirX Still has Rs 420 Cr with Them Despite Bitter Fallout

The Crypto Times

Other articles published on Oct 22, 2024

Why Are Memecoins Thriving Right Now?

POPCAT Continues to Dominate With Double-Digit Gains: Is a New ATH Coming?

The Arena Announces New Launch Date for ARENA Coin

Bitcoiners slam Saylor for throwing weight behind ‘too big to fail’ banks

Altcoin Season Delayed: Bitcoin’s Dominance Holding Back the Market!

Bitcoin Spot ETFs Records $2.67B in Inflows in Just One Week

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!