Chair

Multicoin

DeFi

when

Crypto firms and organizations filed supporting briefs in a lawsuit by a Texas apparel company and the DeFi Education Fund (DEF) against the United States Securities and Exchange Commission over its classification of crypto assets and lack of rules.
Crypto and venture capital companies, including Coinbase, Andreessen Horowitz, Multicoin Capital, Paradigm, Union Square Ventures and Variant supported Texas-based Beba and the DeFi Education Fund’s lawsuit in an amicus <a data-ct-non-breakable="null" href="https://assets.law360news.com/2253000/2253523/andreessen%20horowitz,%20multicoin%20capital,%20paradigm,%20union%20square%20ventures,%20variant.pdf" rel="null" target="null" text="null" title="null">brief</a> filed on Oct. 28.&nbsp;
“The SEC is wrong to ignore the harm that companies like Beba suffer from the threat of enforcement and the lack of clear guidelines,” the brief said.&nbsp;
“The SEC has made this threat “credible” by bringing at least four enforcement actions alleging that airdrops of digital assets constitute “investment contracts,” and thus securities transactions.”&nbsp;
The lawsuit, <a data-ct-non-breakable="null" href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/defi-fund-texas-apparel-company-sue-defend-airdrop-against-sec" rel="null" target="null" text="null" title="null">filed in March</a>, seeks a preemptive declaration that the SEC cannot <a data-ct-non-breakable="null" href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/us-lawmakers-sec-enforcement-crypto-firms-politicized" rel="null" target="null" text="null" title="null">enforce</a> its “unwritten policy” that most digital asset transactions are <a data-ct-non-breakable="null" href="https://cointelegraph.com/learn/commodities-vs-securities" rel="null" target="null" text="null" title="null">securities</a>.&nbsp;
It specifically mentions the free distribution, or airdrop, of the clothing firm’s digital token, BEBA, which the <a data-ct-non-breakable="null" href="https://cointelegraph.com/learn/the-sec-vs-ripple-lawsuit-everything-you-need-to-know" rel="null" target="null" text="null" title="null">SEC</a> has labeled “investment contracts” in violation of the 1933 Securities Act.&nbsp;
The SEC asked the court to <a data-ct-non-breakable="null" href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/sec-claims-preemptive-airdrop-suit-used-phantom-crypto-policy" rel="null" target="null" text="null" title="null">toss the lawsuit</a> in July, claiming that it was “premature and premised on a phantom policy” and that Beba did not define a rule or order relating to the policy it objected to.&nbsp;
The amicus brief concluded that the plaintiffs have adequately pleaded a “credible threat of enforcement and cognizable harm,” and the SEC arguments to the contrary should be rejected, and its motion to dismiss denied.&nbsp;
<figure>
 <img alt="Security, SEC" src="https://s3.cointelegraph.com/uploads/2024-10/0192e113-06ff-7f17-bfe4-08739d2f7102" title="">
 <figcaption style="text-align: center;">
 Snippet from the amicus brief. Source: Law360&nbsp;
 </figcaption>
</figure>
The Texas Blockchain Council and Investor Choice Advocates Network made similar arguments in their amicus brief, <a data-ct-non-breakable="null" href="https://assets.law360news.com/2253000/2253523/texas%20blockchain%20council%20and%20investor%20choice%20advocates%20network.pdf" rel="null" target="null" text="null" title="null">stating</a> that the SEC has “engaged in this litany of enforcement actions while refusing to offer critically needed guidance to the public through the rulemaking process.”&nbsp;
Related: <a data-ct-non-breakable="null" href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/sec-crypto-monetary-enforcement-3000-percent-rise-in-2024" rel="null" target="null" text="null" title="null">SEC crypto enforcement hits $4.7B this year, rising 3,000% from 2023</a>
Crypto policy think-tank Coin Center, which <a data-ct-non-breakable="null" href="https://assets.law360news.com/2253000/2253523/https-ecf-txwd-uscourts-gov-doc1-181133035770.pdf" rel="null" target="null" text="null" title="null">filed</a> a separate brief on Oct. 22, asserted that Beba backer, the <a data-ct-non-breakable="null" href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/def-ends-dao-lawsuits-makerdao-compund-patent-acquisition" rel="null" target="null" text="null" title="null">DeFi Education Fund</a>, was also justified in suing the SEC due to expenses incurred over the regulator’s stance toward crypto.&nbsp;
“When an agency like the SEC refuses to engage in rulemaking or to provide a genuine mechanism for affected parties to participate in the regulatory process, and chooses, instead to prove its public policy choices in the courts, it leaves organizations like DEF with no political avenue to address their concerns aside from those very courts,” it said.&nbsp;
Magazine: <a data-ct-non-breakable="null" href="https://cointelegraph.com/magazine/crypto-regulation-sec-chair-gary-gensler-final-say/" rel="null" target="null" text="null" title="null">Crypto regulation: Does SEC Chair Gary Gensler have the final say?</a>

Crypto titans back clothing firm’s suit against SEC’s ‘unwritten’ rules

Cointelegraph

Other articles published on Oct 31, 2024

Will the SEC Approve Grayscale’s XRP ETF? Here’s What We Know

SEC Reviews Grayscale’s Application to Convert GDLC Fund into an ETF

Celebrating 16 Years of Bitcoin: A Day of Change

Major Factor to Make XRP Explode

Singapore bolsters fintech hub with Global Finance Technology Network

Magic Eden Remains The Leading NFT Marketplace In October 2024, With +400K Users

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!