Injective

The Shanghai High Court has ruled that cryptocurrencies possess “property attributes” under Chinese law, affirming their value as virtual commodities.
However, the court upheld China’s strict prohibition on using crypto for commercial activities such as token issuance and speculative trading, <a href="https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA3MjcxNDM5OQ==&amp;mid=2650784656&amp;idx=1&amp;sn=12cb5b68872ef0e5a8135b9709b5c356&amp;scene=21&amp;poc_token=HFjkPGejmdVdChJw6yhHplv_4PSCUcKFJmoj0LTB" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">according</a> to the court’s ruling.&nbsp;
This ruling arose from a dispute between an agricultural development firm and an investment management company over a failed token launch.&nbsp;
The case, adjudicated by the Songjiang District People’s Court, highlights the ongoing tension between <a href="https://crypto.news/chinas-supreme-court-recognizes-crypto-in-landmark-aml-law-update/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">China’s recognition of crypto</a> as property and its <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://crypto.news/criminal-gang-behind-fake-crypto-wallets-arrested-in-china/">crackdown</a> on crypto-related financial activities.
You might also like: <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://crypto.news/injective-unveils-sdk-allowing-users-create-own-on-chain-ai-agents/"> Injective unveils SDK allowing users create own on-chain AI agents </a>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="strong-court-rules-on-token-issuance-dispute-strong">Court rules on token issuance dispute</h3>
The conflict dates back to 2017, during a cryptocurrency market boom. The agricultural company, referred to as Company X in court documents, sought to issue tokens and raise funds through a “Blockchain Incubation Agreement” with the investment firm, identified as Company S.
Under the agreement, Company S was tasked with preparing a white paper and facilitating the token issuance using blockchain technologies. Company X paid a service fee of 300,000 yuan ($41,000).
A year later, the tokens had not been issued, with Company S claiming additional app development was necessary—costs not covered under the agreement. Frustrated, Company X sued to terminate the contract and recover its payment.
The court ruled the agreement invalid, citing China’s prohibition of token issuance as an illegal financial activity akin to unlicensed public fundraising. While both companies were deemed at fault, Company S was ordered to return 250,000 yuan of the service fee to Company X.
You might also like: <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://crypto.news/brazils-central-bank-unveils-phase-2-of-its-cbdc-pilot/"> Brazil’s central bank unveils phase 2 of its CBDC pilot </a>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="strong-legal-status-of-crypto-in-china-strong">Legal status of crypto in China</h3>
The court clarified that while virtual currencies are considered property and are not explicitly banned, business activities involving them remain illegal. This distinction underscores China’s broader policy of curbing financial instability and criminal activities tied to cryptocurrencies, such as fraud and money laundering.
According to the ruling, individuals may legally hold cryptocurrencies as personal assets. However, engaging in crypto-related business ventures exposes entities to significant legal risks.
You might also like: <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://crypto.news/tether-to-invest-in-quantoz-to-support-mica-compliant-stablecoins/"> Tether to invest in Quantoz to support MiCA-compliant stablecoins </a>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="strong-crypto-implications-in-china-strong">Crypto implications in China</h3>
The court’s decision reflects China’s ongoing “high-pressure” stance against speculative cryptocurrency activities aimed at maintaining financial order.
The judgment serves as a warning about the legal risks associated with participating in crypto transactions or launching token projects without proper authorization. Contracts found to violate financial regulations are likely to be deemed invalid, limiting legal recourse.
The judge overseeing the case emphasized the importance of strict compliance with financial laws to avoid such outcomes, serving as a reminder for entities navigating the legal landscape of cryptocurrencies in China.

Shanghai court recognizes crypto as property but bans business activities

Table of Contents

crypto.news

Other articles published on Nov 19, 2024

Semler Scientific Expands Bitcoin Holdings Significantly

Top 8 Coins Revealed: Discover the Best Crypto to Hold in November 2024 for Explosive 100x Returns

Brian Armstrong to Meet Donald Trump Over Personnel: Report

Big News for Bitcoin Was Announced Yesterday: Why Is the Launch of Spot Bitcoin ETF Options So Im...

Ripple CTO and Cardano Creator Find Common Ground Amid XRP and ADA Rally

U.S. Prosecutors Seek to Seize $5 Million from Crypto Romance Scam

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!