Rule

Bitcoin

Swan Bitcoin, a financial services firm focused on Bitcoin, has <a href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/swan-bitcoin-sues-lawyers-adding-tether-as-client" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">filed</a> a legal malpractice suit against its retained law firm, Gibson, Dunn &amp; Crutcher, in California’s Superior Court. The lawsuit, submitted on November 22, accuses Gibson of prioritizing <a href="https://thecoinrise.com/stablecoin-market-cap-hits-record-168b-amid-continuous-growth-tether-leads/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">top stablecoin issuer Tether</a> over its existing client relationship with Swan.
The conflict surfaced after Gibson hired attorney Barry Berke, who represents Tether. Swan alleges that Gibson’s actions violated attorney-client ethics by attempting to sever ties under the pretext of a conflict of interest. According to Swan’s filing, Gibson “wooed and won Swan” to represent it in a legal battle against former employees, only to later pivot to embracing Tether as a client.
The tension stems from an ongoing lawsuit Swan filed in September against ex-employees accused of misappropriating proprietary software code to establish a competing firm, Proton Management. Swan claims Proton persuaded Tether to terminate its partnership with Swan and instead align with Proton. Tether, however, is not named as a defendant in that lawsuit.
<h2 id="span-style-font-weight-400-swan-pushes-back-on-withdrawal-span">Swan Pushes Back on Withdrawal</h2>
As the controversy escalated, Gibson formally moved to withdraw as Swan’s counsel in its lawsuit against Proton, citing a “complete breakdown of the attorney-client relationship.” Gibson also claimed Swan refused to pay outstanding legal fees and demanded millions of dollars in compensation for not opposing the withdrawal request.
Swan responded on November 25 by seeking a temporary restraining order to prevent Gibson from stepping away from its <a href="https://thecoinrise.com/proton-management-seeks-dismissal-in-legal-battle-with-swan-bitcoin/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">legal case against Proton</a> and from onboarding Tether as a client. Swan further argues that Gibson’s actions are a blatant violation of the “Hot Potato” Rule in legal ethics, which prohibits attorneys from dropping clients to avoid conflicts of interest.
<h2 id="span-style-font-weight-400-implications-for-crypto-legal-representation-span">Implications for Crypto Legal Representation</h2>
The restraining order hearing is set for November 26, with Swan demanding accountability for what it deems a betrayal by its legal representation. As a result, Swan’s CEO, Cory Klippsten, has criticized Gibson’s handling of the situation, framing it as a cautionary tale of loyalty sacrificed for financial incentives.
As the court deliberates, the case could set a precedent for how law firms manage overlapping client relationships in the competitive crypto industry.
The post <a href="https://thecoinrise.com/swan-bitcoin-sues-law-firm-gibson-dunn-over-alleged-conflict-of-interest-with-tether/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Swan Bitcoin Sues Law Firm Gibson Dunn Over Alleged Conflict of Interest with Tether</a> appeared first on <a href="https://thecoinrise.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">TheCoinrise.com</a>.

Swan Bitcoin Sues Law Firm Gibson Dunn Over Alleged Conflict of Interest with Tether

Table of Contents

TheCoinrise Media

Other articles published on Nov 26, 2024

Crypto Ownership Bumps 2%, UK Financial Conduct Authority Reports

Is Dogecoin Set to Jump 90%? Breaking Down the Buzz

Brazil Introduces Bill to Create National Bitcoin Reserve

Mad Price Prediction: MAD Surges 233% In A Week, But Experts Say Consider This Innovative Staking...

Justin Sun Drops $6.2M on Controversial Banana Art, Calls It a "Cultural Phenomenon"

VanEck Expands Crypto Product Portfolio with New SUI ETN for European Investors

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!