Cardano

<figure>
 <figcaption>
 Cover image via <a href="https://u.today/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">U.Today</a>
 </figcaption>
</figure>
Ethereum Foundation researcher Justin Drake's claim about the Cardano network was discussed by <a href="https://u.today/cardano-founder-reacts-to-satoshi-wallet-breach-speculations" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Cardano founder</a> Charles Hoskinson in a recent X post.
Justin Drake recently appeared on the Paul Barron network show, where he discussed the proposed Beam Chain upgrade to enhance Ethereum’s consensus layer with faster finality and zero-knowledge proof integration. Part of the discussion sought to answer the questions, "Is liquid staking an immediate threat to Ethereum?" and "Is Cardano staking superior to Ethereum?"
The topic in question raised some misconceptions, leading Hoskinson to elaborate on the strong security model that supports the project, which he drew inspiration from for Bitcoin's design.
Hoskinson <a href="https://x.com/IOHK_Charles/status/1866972760339017759" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">responded</a>, "I guess he doesn't understand how Nakamoto consensus works or Ouroboros, for that matter. Cardano's security model was inspired by Bitcoin's design. We don't have BFT style rounds." He highlighted that Cardano's approach does not require slashing, and it enjoys 50% Byzantine resistance.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
 This guy is the chief scientist??? I guess he doesn't understand how nakamoto consensus works or Ouroboros, for that matter. Cardano's security model was inspired by Bitcoin's design. We don't have BFT style rounds. You don't need slashing, and it enjoys 50 percent byzantine… <a href="https://t.co/XvHO1aftBf" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">https://t.co/XvHO1aftBf</a>— Charles Hoskinson (@IOHK_Charles) <a href="https://twitter.com/IOHK_Charles/status/1866972760339017759?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">December 11, 2024</a>
</blockquote>
Unlike classical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) protocols, Cardano employs a different notion of finality. Hoskinson expressed surprise that, even after seven years, Ethereum's scientists have not engaged with Cardano's research or studied its network. This lack of engagement has led to misunderstandings about Cardano's capabilities and security mechanisms.
<h2 id="x-community-react">X community react</h2>
X users provided context to the Paul Barron Network's tweet, revealing the misconception that the tweet framed.
They stated that <a href="https://u.today/cardano-founder-reacts-as-network-steps-into-new-era-of-governance" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Cardano</a> never finalizes two conflicting checkpoints. In theory, discrepancies can be settled in 36 hours, but in practice, they are usually sorted out in 40 seconds.
Thinking that Cardano, like Ethereum, is subject to the same inconsistencies that invalidate the existence of slashing is a gross misunderstanding. This is in line with what the Cardano founder has always been arguing, Cardano requires slashing and not needslashing. For example, slashing is the punishment of the validators on (PoS) networks, such as Ethereum, when they commit infractions like double signing or an invalid transaction. <a href="https://u.today/inspired-by-bitcoin-cardano-founder-addresses-network-security-concerns" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Read original article on U.Today</a>

'Inspired by Bitcoin': Cardano Founder Addresses Network Security Concerns

Table of Contents

U_Today

Other articles published on Dec 12, 2024

MEKU: The First XRP AI Token Revolutionizing Meme Culture and Crypto

XRP's Path to $5.85: Can Ripple's Legal Clarity Boost Its Momentum?

Bitvavo Again Largest EUR-Spot Exchange Worldwide

Uniswap Price Jumps 20% Today: Is $25 the Next Target?

Bitcoin 15% futures basis 'insane' as BTC price sees record daily close

Californian Court Orders $5 Million Penalty in IcomTech Ponzi Scheme Case

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!