The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has released its final guidance report for member states making the final transition to the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation.&nbsp;
Laws formed under MiCA regulations began <a data-ct-non-breakable="null" href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/mica-laws-crypto-europe-impact" rel="null" target="null" text="null" title="null">taking effect in June 2024</a>, with final implementation scheduled for Dec. 30. The latest and final guidance from the ESMA is meant to help member states still seeking regulatory clarity with their final implementations ahead of the deadline.
As Cointelegraph reported, <a data-ct-non-breakable="null" href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/euro-stablecoins-rise-mica-stellar-launch" rel="null" target="null" text="null" title="null">the stablecoin market has surged</a> under MiCA guidance. However, as recently as Dec. 10, at least six European Union member states — Belgium, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Luxembourg and Romania — were <a data-ct-non-breakable="null" href="https://blockonomi.com/multiple-eu-countries-behind-schedule-for-mica-crypto-implementation/" rel="null" target="null" text="null" title="null">reporting</a> difficulties in meeting the end-of-year-deadline due to uncertainty and a lack of regulatory clarity in the initial MiCA documents.&nbsp;
Per the ESMA’s final guidance report:
<blockquote>
 “Stakeholders generally appreciated the clarity of the draft guidelines and the comprehensive&nbsp;approach taken by ESMA. Several respondents highlighted the need for further clarity on&nbsp;specific criteria and conditions, while others expressed concerns about the potential&nbsp;administrative burden the draft guidelines might impose.”
</blockquote>
<h2 id="regulatory-uncertainty">Regulatory uncertainty</h2>
Member states and industry stakeholders were active in the commentary period between association reports with participation from dozens of member states and stakeholders. The feedback <a data-ct-non-breakable="null" href="https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2024-12/ESMA75453128700-1323_Final_Report_Guidelines_on_the_conditions_and_criteria_for_the_qualification_of_CAs_as_FIs.pdf" rel="null" target="null" text="null" title="null">resulted</a> in EMSA guidance on 12 distinct concerns, the majority of which related to clarifying classifications for specific assets and their legal use.&nbsp;
Chief among the concerns was that member states would arrive at different interpretations of many MiCA laws due to insufficient explanations. 
“Several respondents highlighted the potential for legal uncertainty due to the scope of the guidelines and the way the conditions and criteria detailed in the guidelines could be understood by NCAs [national competent authorities],” wrote the EMSA, adding that this could lead to “diverging interpretations across member states.”
Related: <a data-ct-non-breakable="null" href="https://cointelegraph.com/news/europe-esma-recommend-mica-amendments" rel="" target="_blank" text="null" title="https://cointelegraph.com/news/europe-esma-recommend-mica-amendments">EU markets watchdog urges amendments to MiCA crypto regulations</a>
To address these concerns, the ESMA included a series of explanatory scenarios covering various aspects of digital asset regulation under MiCA. However, according to the report, MiCA has declined to provide “real world” examples because the guidelines cannot express an opinion on the classification of specific cryptocurrencies or similar assets.&nbsp;
The report also addressed concerns over the EU’s Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) guidance. MiFID II was rolled out after the 2008 global financial crisis to standardize financial practices across the bloc. 
Member states are calling for an update to the regulation to include a clear definition of crypto assets as financial instruments. In response, the ESMA’s guidance suggests providing additional clarity on MiFID II rules without changing the definition of financial instruments. This would presumably strike a balance between determining the conditions and criteria used to classify crypto-assets and enabling a “one size fits all” approach to regulation.&nbsp;
Member states also worried that there wasn’t enough clarity in the MiCA laws for them to make determinations on which assets were legally transferable, how to promote and ensure “technology neutrality” under the current rules, and how classifications such as “securities,” “derivatives,” and emission allowances applied across different crypto-asset types.
Despite this being the Final Guidance Report ahead of the Dec. 30 deadline, the ESMA wrote throughout the 49-page document that it would continue to work with lawmakers and stakeholders to develop further clarity without changing the letter of the laws.&nbsp;
Magazine: <a data-ct-non-breakable="null" href="https://cointelegraph.com/magazine/13-christmas-gifts-bitcoin-crypto-degens-will-love/" rel="null" target="null" text="null" title="null">13 Christmas gifts that Bitcoin and crypto degens will love</a>

EU Securities and Markets Authority publishes final guidance for MiCA

Table of Contents

Cointelegraph

Other articles published on Dec 17, 2024

PENGU Token Goes Live: Binance Listing and Airdrop Details Revealed

XRP Makes Comeback On RLUSD Launch, Shiba Inu (SHIB) Has No Ground Under Its Feet, Solana (SOL) D...

TokenBuilder Releases 2025 Forecast on AI Integration and Fair Token Offerings (17 Dec)

Avalanche's Major Upgrade, Avalanche9000, Goes Live on Mainnet

US lawmakers cancel session to consider Caroline Crenshaw’s nomination

Is It Too Late To Buy AI16Z? Ai16Z Price Soars 53% In A Week And This Might Be The Next Crypto To...

Join our free newsletter for daily crypto updates!