Across Protocol Proposes ACX Token Supply Cap Amid Contract Concerns
Crypto News

Across Protocol Proposes ACX Token Supply Cap Amid Contract Concerns

2m
Created 1mo ago, last updated 1mo ago

Across Protocol has proposed a cap on its ACX token supply in response to concerns raised by LayerZero Labs CEO Bryan Pellegrino.

Across Protocol Proposes ACX Token Supply Cap Amid Contract Concerns

Across Protocol has proposed a cap on its ACX token supply in response to concerns raised by LayerZero Labs CEO Bryan Pellegrino.

Pellegrino highlighted a function in the Across token contract that potentially allowed the contract owner to burn ACX tokens from any wallet, raising alarms about security.

The proposal, introduced by Across co-founder Hart Lambur, aims to limit the total supply of ACX tokens to one billion. If approved by the community, the proposal would also transfer ownership of the ACX token to a null address (0x0), effectively preventing any future changes to the token supply through minting or burning.

Pellegrino criticized the Across token contract, claiming it has a “critical issue.” He contended that the capability to burn tokens could result in arbitrary losses for token holders, calling it a significant transparency concern.

View post on Twitter

In response, Lambur dismissed Pellegrino’s remarks as “disingenuous FUD and fear-mongering,” asserting that the contract had been audited by OpenZeppelin and was secure.

View post on Twitter

Jota Carpanelli, head of security at OpenZeppelin, defended the contract's design, stating that its mint and burn functions were controlled by a Safe multi-signature wallet and functioned correctly.

View post on Twitter

Pellegrino, however, challenged this assessment, suggesting that the design choice was flawed and that many users might be unaware of the risks involved.

As the community engages in a non-binding temperature check vote regarding the proposal, preliminary results indicate strong support, with 99.5% favoring the supply cap.

Meanwhile, the ACX token's value has dropped approximately 4% to $0.28 following the allegations.

This article contains links to third-party websites or other content for information purposes only (“Third-Party Sites”). The Third-Party Sites are not under the control of CoinMarketCap, and CoinMarketCap is not responsible for the content of any Third-Party Site, including without limitation any link contained in a Third-Party Site, or any changes or updates to a Third-Party Site. CoinMarketCap is providing these links to you only as a convenience, and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsement, approval or recommendation by CoinMarketCap of the site or any association with its operators. This article is intended to be used and must be used for informational purposes only. It is important to do your own research and analysis before making any material decisions related to any of the products or services described. This article is not intended as, and shall not be construed as, financial advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author’s [company’s] own and do not necessarily reflect those of CoinMarketCap.
0 people liked this article