BlackRock Overtakes Grayscale by AUM for Listed Crypto Products
Crypto News

BlackRock Overtakes Grayscale by AUM for Listed Crypto Products

1m
Created 2mo ago, last updated 2mo ago

According to CoinShares’ Head of Research, James Butterfill, BlackRock surpassed Grayscale in assets under management (AUM) for publicly-listed crypto products faster than anticipated.

BlackRock Overtakes Grayscale by AUM for Listed Crypto Products

According to CoinShares’ Head of Research, James Butterfill, BlackRock surpassed Grayscale in assets under management (AUM) for publicly-listed crypto products faster than anticipated. This shift underscores the influence of established ETF providers and their rapid market dominance.

View post on Twitter

Eight months after the introduction of spot Bitcoin ETFs, BlackRock’s spot Ethereum and Bitcoin ETFs have now amassed $22 billion, surpassing Grayscale’s $20.7 billion, which includes funds for Solana and Chainlink. The launch of spot Ethereum ETFs in July accelerated this change, with Grayscale’s Ethereum Trust (ETHE) facing persistent outflows.

Butterfill points to $2.3 billion in outflows from ETHE as a key factor in this transition. Meanwhile, BlackRock has seen significant inflows, with $966 million netted for its spot Ethereum ETF. The competition between Grayscale and BlackRock narrows, with a $1.5 billion gap in their Bitcoin ETFs. Grayscale’s Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) leads with $18.7 billion in AUM, but ongoing outflows have allowed BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) to close in with $17.2 billion.

Grayscale has also invested in advertising, using airports and New York City subways to promote its products. However, BlackRock’s Ethereum product, with an expense ratio of 0.25%, competes with offerings from Fidelity and Invesco. In contrast, Grayscale’s spot Ethereum ETF has a higher expense ratio of 2.5%, although its Ethereum Mini Trust offers a more competitive 0.15%.

Butterfill believes Grayscale faces challenges in reclaiming its leading position, as investors are drawn to cheaper alternatives. "Keeping fees high will deter many investors," he noted.

This article contains links to third-party websites or other content for information purposes only (“Third-Party Sites”). The Third-Party Sites are not under the control of CoinMarketCap, and CoinMarketCap is not responsible for the content of any Third-Party Site, including without limitation any link contained in a Third-Party Site, or any changes or updates to a Third-Party Site. CoinMarketCap is providing these links to you only as a convenience, and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsement, approval or recommendation by CoinMarketCap of the site or any association with its operators. This article is intended to be used and must be used for informational purposes only. It is important to do your own research and analysis before making any material decisions related to any of the products or services described. This article is not intended as, and shall not be construed as, financial advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author’s [company’s] own and do not necessarily reflect those of CoinMarketCap.
0 people liked this article