Crypto.com Faces Backlash After Reversing 70 Billion CRO Token Burn, Alleging Vote Manipulation
Crypto News

Crypto.com Faces Backlash After Reversing 70 Billion CRO Token Burn, Alleging Vote Manipulation

2m
Created 1w ago, last updated 1w ago

Crypto.com has come under fire after it reversed a major token burn on the Cronos blockchain, which was initially announced in 2021 as the “largest token burn in history.”

Crypto.com Faces Backlash After Reversing 70 Billion CRO Token Burn, Alleging Vote Manipulation

Crypto.com has come under fire after it reversed a major token burn on the Cronos blockchain, which was initially announced in 2021 as the “largest token burn in history.” The company planned to burn 70 billion CRO tokens to decentralize the network but recently proposed to reissue these tokens, bringing the total supply back to 100 billion. This has led to widespread criticism and accusations of vote manipulation within the crypto community.

The proposal, introduced on March 2, suggested the creation of a Cronos Strategic Reserve, which would reverse the token burn. The idea was met with backlash on social media, with many crypto users condemning the decision. Despite the vocal opposition, the vote passed, with Crypto.com-linked validators controlling 70% of the voting power, effectively ensuring the proposal’s approval. Independent validators, who largely opposed the reversal, were unable to influence the outcome due to Crypto.com’s dominance in the network’s governance.

Many in the community have expressed concerns about the centralization of power in the hands of Crypto.com, as it controls a large portion of the voting power. This has led to fears of an unfair governance process, with some accusing the company of manipulating the vote to suit its interests. The re-issuance of tokens has also raised doubts about the company’s commitment to decentralization, a key feature many blockchain projects strive for.

CEO Kris Marszalek responded to the backlash on March 19 by emphasizing Crypto.com’s financial stability and regulatory compliance, citing the company’s $1 billion in gross profits from the previous year. However, he did not directly address the issue of the token burn reversal. This silence on the matter led some community members to question why, with the company’s substantial profits, Crypto.com did not buy tokens off the market instead of re-issuing billions of new CRO tokens.

The reversal has also impacted CRO’s market performance. The token’s price has fallen 8% this week, dropping to around $0.079, far below its peak value of $0.9698 in November 2021. The decision has sparked fears that the token’s value will continue to decline as a result of the increased supply.

Crypto.com has scheduled an AMA for March 25, where it is expected to address these concerns and provide more clarity on the decision. While the company insists that the move is in the best interest of the network’s long-term growth, the reversal of the token burn has raised serious questions about its governance practices and its ability to maintain decentralization.
This article contains links to third-party websites or other content for information purposes only (“Third-Party Sites”). The Third-Party Sites are not under the control of CoinMarketCap, and CoinMarketCap is not responsible for the content of any Third-Party Site, including without limitation any link contained in a Third-Party Site, or any changes or updates to a Third-Party Site. CoinMarketCap is providing these links to you only as a convenience, and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsement, approval or recommendation by CoinMarketCap of the site or any association with its operators. This article is intended to be used and must be used for informational purposes only. It is important to do your own research and analysis before making any material decisions related to any of the products or services described. This article is not intended as, and shall not be construed as, financial advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author’s [company’s] own and do not necessarily reflect those of CoinMarketCap.
1 person liked this article