Grayscale Files for Spot Hedera (HBAR) ETF as SEC Reviews Multiple Altcoin ETF Proposals
Crypto News

Grayscale Files for Spot Hedera (HBAR) ETF as SEC Reviews Multiple Altcoin ETF Proposals

2m
Created 3w ago, last updated 3w ago

Grayscale Investments has filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for a spot Hedera (HBAR) exchange-traded fund (ETF), aiming to list the new fund on Nasdaq.

Grayscale Files for Spot Hedera (HBAR) ETF as SEC Reviews Multiple Altcoin ETF Proposals
Grayscale Investments has filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for a spot Hedera (HBAR) exchange-traded fund (ETF), aiming to list the new fund on Nasdaq. This is part of a broader push by Grayscale to expand its ETF offerings beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum, with HBAR becoming its sixth altcoin-focused ETF filing. The process for approval involves two steps, with the SEC first acknowledging the filing before it is published in the Federal Register, starting the formal review. Bloomberg analysts Eric Balchunas and James Seyffart suggest that HBAR, along with Litecoin, has a better chance of approval compared to other altcoins due to their regulatory progress.

Grayscale has previously filed for ETFs involving other altcoins, including Dogecoin (DOGE), XRP, Cardano (ADA), and Solana (SOL), which are still under review. Nasdaq made a similar filing for an HBAR ETF just a week before Grayscale’s, highlighting growing interest in the token. Though there have been no approvals yet, Hedera's increasing popularity, backed by corporate giants like Google, IBM, and Boeing, adds to its appeal as an investment-grade asset.

The SEC, under Acting Chair Mark Uyeda, has been more open to altcoin ETFs, partly due to the Trump administration’s more crypto-friendly policies. This shift has led to a rise in crypto ETF filings, with hopes that approving smaller altcoins will create the foundation for an index ETF in the future. A source close to the matter indicated that such approvals could set the stage for broader ETF acceptance in the coming months.

The Grayscale HBAR ETF filing is one of several that the SEC is considering. Grayscale is also working to convert its Dogecoin Trust into an ETF, with that proposal still under review. Additionally, the SEC is reviewing an XRP ETF from Grayscale. These developments could influence the future of crypto ETFs in the U.S., particularly if they are approved.

Approval for these ETFs could take up to 240 days, as the SEC’s review process includes an initial 45-day period for public comment. While Bitcoin ETFs were approved in 2024, altcoin ETFs still face challenges, particularly related to concerns about market manipulation and liquidity. The SEC has also delayed its decision on Cboe’s request to list options for Ether ETFs, pushing the decision to May.

The Grayscale HBAR ETF and other altcoin proposals mark an important step in the ongoing process of making crypto more accessible to traditional investors. If approved, these products could significantly increase institutional adoption and broaden the market for altcoin investments.

This article contains links to third-party websites or other content for information purposes only (“Third-Party Sites”). The Third-Party Sites are not under the control of CoinMarketCap, and CoinMarketCap is not responsible for the content of any Third-Party Site, including without limitation any link contained in a Third-Party Site, or any changes or updates to a Third-Party Site. CoinMarketCap is providing these links to you only as a convenience, and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsement, approval or recommendation by CoinMarketCap of the site or any association with its operators. This article is intended to be used and must be used for informational purposes only. It is important to do your own research and analysis before making any material decisions related to any of the products or services described. This article is not intended as, and shall not be construed as, financial advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author’s [company’s] own and do not necessarily reflect those of CoinMarketCap.
1 person liked this article