Also today, a recent opinion piece in the Financial Times has set Crypto Twitter aflame.
Today's headlines
But first — subscribe to our newsletter.
Listen to the CoinMarketRecap podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Google Podcasts
Editor's Note: Is Bitcoin Crypto?
Molly Jane Zuckerman writes...
A few years ago, there was a big faction of crypto people that did not like to think of themselves are crypto people — I'm in it for the tech, was their rallying cry. Or, blockchain without Bitcoin, was another.
Now, a recent opinion piece in the Financial Times has set Crypto Twitter aflame with another distinction that I wasn't aware that people were making en masse — Bitcoin, not crypto.
The argument goes: Bitcoin came before there was a market for it, therefore it's maintained by people who believe in its value, rather than its profit potential. Plus, its founder created the coin and then dipped, meaning that there is true decentralization unlike basically every coin after it. Еrgo, Bitcoin is not crypto.
This FT piece took these arguments and broke them apart — the piece claimed that Bitcoin is now being used to make a profit, that mining pools defy its decentralization claims, and that all the Bitcoin forks out their confuse the idea of what Bitcoin even is. Ergo, Bitcoin is crypto, and it's basically all bad.
Crypto Twitter, as you may imagine, had many, many issues with these points. Pete Rizzo, former EiC of CoinDesk, wrote an impassioned tweet thread where he split up Bitcoin and altcoins into three, entirely separate categories: coins where investors can buy prior to launch, founders with allocations prior to launch, and Bitcoin.
Other Twitter commentary were less eloquent, throwing about claims of FUD (exactly one of the issues raised in the FT piece is that it's too hard to have a logical argument about the merits of crypto because people prefer to just yell "FUD"). One tweeter posted a meme of a Bitcoin Pepe the frog with a T-shirt reading "didn't read, never selling."
Last month, we wrote about the crypto skeptics symposium that took place in London, allowing a group of crypto naysayers to meet together and talk about why crypto is bad. On the other hand, basically every other crypto conference out there is a long weekend of people applauding crypto.
Perhaps the Financial Times' next opinion piece could show the other, crypto-optimistic side of things, giving people like Rizzo a spot to showcase their maxi views and let readers decide where they fall.