In this special report, CoinMarketCap Academy venture to the European Union — taking a look at which nations are most crypto-friendly, how EU regulations affect cryptocurrencies and more.
The EU and cryptocurrencies. Relationship status: it’s complicated.
- The crypto-friendliest countries in Europe
- The latest EU regulation of cryptocurrencies
- The ECB's stance on a digital euro
- How the ECB's monetary policy impacts crypto prices
Join us in showcasing the cryptocurrency revolution, one newsletter at a time. Subscribe now to get daily news and market updates right to your inbox, along with our millions of other subscribers (that’s right, millions love us!) — what are you waiting for?
Which European Nations Are the Most Crypto-Friendly?
In terms of crypto taxes, European countries are not as anti-crypto as their officials make it sound. Let’s take a look at some of the top European nations with crypto-friendly tax regimes.
Germany 🇩🇪
Portugal 🇵🇹
Slovenia 🇸🇮
Cryptocurrency Regulation in the EU
1. Transfer of Funds Regulation (ToFR)
2. Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA)
Both were passed to "facilitate the competitiveness and innovation of the financial sector in the European Union, to establish Europe as a global standard setter and to provide consumer protection for digital finance and modern payments."
Let's look at each in more detail.
Transfer of Funds Regulation (ToFR)
- All crypto asset transfers will have to be linked to a real identity, regardless of value.
- Service providers involving crypto assets (i.e. exchanges) will have to collect information about the issuer and the beneficiary of the transfers they execute
- All companies providing crypto-related services in any EU member state will become obliged entities under the existing AML directive.
- Non-custodial wallets will be required to collect and store information about their customers' transfers.
- Enhanced compliance measures apply when dealing with non-EU entities.
This, of course, is virtually impossible to enforce and sort of defeats the purpose of a non-custodial wallet.
Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA)
- The European Securities and Market Authority (ESMA, the European equivalent of the SEC) and the European Bank Authority can prohibit or restrict the sale or marketing of crypto assets by Virtual Asset Service Providers (i.e. exchanges).
- The ESMA will develop a methodology and sustainability indicators to measure the impact of crypto assets on the climate.
- The ESMA will supervise exchanges regulated in non-EU countries.
- Exchanges will be subject to AML regulation and will have liability for damages or losses caused to their customers due to hacks or operational failures that they should have avoided.
- Exchanges will have to segregate clients' assets and isolate them.
- Exchanges will have to warn investors about the risk of volatility and losses.
- Stablecoins will have to maintain reserves to cover all claims and the reserves will have to be fully protected.
The ECB's Stance on a Digital Euro and CBDCs
- Fabio Panetta, a member of the European Central Bank's executive board, says a digital euro will come by 2026.
- A Bank of Finland governor says it could facilitate pan-European services.
- The ECB has launched an investigation phase of a digital euro.
- Stablecoins could have contagion effects on the real economy through their exposure to government and private debt. This would depend on the liquidity of the underlying collateral but is at least not completely wrong.
- DeFi needs regulation (probably true, but painting with a broad brush here).
- Stablecoins are impractical as a means of payment, which has already been proven false.
- Bitcoin is (unsurprisingly) considered too wasteful and dismissed for having no KYC.
- Fintech solutions and correspondent banking, which are currently the most popular options, are solid but deemed inefficient.
- Stablecoins are dismissed for eating away at monetary sovereignty.
- CBDCs (unsurprisingly) are lauded as the best and most efficient option, despite some privacy concerns that still need to be addressed.
- CBDCs are good for retaining monetary policy control and prevent the exit to a foreign currency, as is the case with stablecoins.
- CBDCs also give policymakers a more direct and immediate transmission mechanism for policies, such as reducing friction in fiscal payments.
- CBDCs allow for more effective implementation of monetary policy through interest rate hikes. While the paper paints this in a positive light, it's questionable whether concentrating so much power at the central bank is something desirable.
- CBDCs are commended for being an effective "remuneration tool" (others would call it financial control). Overall, the working paper recommends investigating a CBDC further to not give up control of the payments market to private (non-European) companies.
The report calls upon public authorities to "evaluate whether the outsized carbon footprint of certain crypto-assets undermines the achievement of their green transition commitments," a thinly-veiled threat to not let miners set up shop.
ECB Monetary Policy and Crypto Prices
"While all macro decisions matter, the Fed is the most important as it drives the global policy."
However, considering monetary policies among advanced economies are rarely diametrically opposite to each other (Japan being a notable exception), it's probably not surprising that the Federal Reserve is seen as the one setting the tone for the rest.
Conclusion
The EU is often portrayed as bloated with bureaucracy and averse to innovation, and not undeservedly so. The European crypto industry is fighting an uphill battle against its only bureaucrats and competing jurisdictions like the UK and Australia, which both aim for much more crypto-friendly regulation.
That being said, crypto tax regimes in Europe are surprisingly vanilla in many countries, so it literally pays to hold on to your coins.